Blitzwolf BW-SHP6 support

[m4rcu5]

Hi,

It would be nice to have the BW-SHP6 supported. As I have a pair of them, as well as the SHP2, I was preparing a full-on tear-down and comparison of both, until I stumbled across this issue: arendst/Tasmota#4091.
It mentions that both devices are mostly the same, pin compatible and therefore the firmware of the SHP2 should work.

I've tested the Espurna SHP2 firmware and it seems to be fully compatible. I could not detect any issues;
LEDs and switching works as expected, power consumption seems right (I have no validated load to test with at the moment)

I did make a bunch of photos which I would like to add to the wiki, including instructions on how to disassemble and flash the firmware. If one of the devs can confirm and add a SHP6 build, I will update the wiki.

[erkgh]

Indeed, my experiences are the same for the both BW-SHP6 EU I have used the past 4 weeks.

[mcspr]

Note on the wiki would be welcome.

Question: is the any need to add separate binary if SHP2 .bin works?

[m4rcu5]

Note on the wiki would be welcome.

Let me fix that in the next days. I already have the photos ready to roll. 😄

Question: is the any need to add separate binary if SHP2 .bin works?

If there are indeed no other changes, then the main reason would be to have the correct model in the interface?

[mcspr]

Would've liked to replace this, but DEVICE is used in several other places and would look wonky :/

espurna/code/espurna/config/hardware.h

Lines 2661 to 2662 in 5968515

	#define MANUFACTURER "BLITZWOLF"
	#define DEVICE "BWSHP2"

Well, might as well add duplicate hardware definition / platformio.ini config + notice.

[xoseperez]

Maybe we should decouple the DEVICE from the UI strings...

[mcspr]

Now that I think about it - just adding a check for SHP define to set boardName setting like on the screenshot above. I was under assumption it was used directly, but everything goes through set/getBoardName / DEVICE_NAME value.

[evlo]

I read these are quite unreliable regarding power consumption measurement. How bad is it if I expect 70-100% load 24/7?