Corrected intro #20
Open
Corrected intro #20
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also, added multi-sized fonts New examples images other adjustments
xi
force-pushed
the
main
branch
7 times, most recently
from
05077c1 to
d1a2dc1
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a very revised PR from #11.
This one also adds a significant change in the examples in the introduction, in that I added a rudimentary set of levels/font sizes based on use-case levels as seen in the SAPC use case matrix.
The font size levels used are 32px bold, and 24px, 18px, 16px normal. The lookup/labels are not "totally" accurate, but should be within ±3% or so. This is not using the Silver/Gold LUT approach, but the Bronze levels approach (inclusive are the interpolated half levels).
I suppose I should have built this sooner, it REALLY hammers home the differences.
Also changed the formatting requests relative to PR #11