-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 193
fix: improve gzip request decompression middleware #2077
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
""" WalkthroughThe changes update middleware ordering to apply request size limiting after decompression, preventing decompression attacks. The compression middleware now closes the original request body properly and clears content length headers. Compression middleware tests are refactored for clarity and correctness, and new tests verify enforcement of request size limits, including for compressed requests. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
9d4295f to
bd51ca9
Compare
Router-nonroot image scan passed✅ No security vulnerabilities found in image: |
bd51ca9 to
91cd223
Compare
Noroth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this solution will not prevent scenarios with excessively large requests that could potentially cause the router to be oom killed in the worst case.
We could make use of something like
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
We have this already in place. @endigma is the order right? |
I fixed the order in the PR, it now goes |
StarpTech
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
ysmolski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you @endigma for the patience and time.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests
Checklist