Oxford Comma #3037
Merged
Oxford Comma #3037
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
The failures are from modifying the beta docs which are currently excluded from being built. Since this isn't that important, I'd recommend not making any changes to the beta documents. |
Contributor
Author
|
|
sciencewhiz
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2025
sciencewhiz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No one asked for it. But I did it anyway.
The Oxford Comma is recommended for technical writing.
I added it wherever I could find it missing.