Skip to content

Conversation

octo-sts[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@octo-sts octo-sts bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Signed-off-by: wolfi-bot <121097084+wolfi-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added request-version-update request for a newer version of a package automated pr labels Dec 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Gen AI suggestions to solve the build error:

Based on the error output, I'll analyze and provide a solution:

• Detected Error: "can't find file to patch at input line 3... The text leading up to this was: |--- a/lib/alloc.h"

• Error Category: Configuration/Patch

• Failure Point: During the patch step in the pipeline, specifically when trying to apply fix-undefined-reference.patch

• Root Cause Analysis: The patch is failing because the path specified in the patch file doesn't match the source tree structure, or the patch file is trying to modify a file that doesn't exist at the expected location.

• Suggested Fix:

  1. Update the patch section in the YAML to include the -p1 strip option:
  - uses: patch
    with:
      patches: |
        fix-undefined-reference.patch \
        useradd-defaults.patch
      strip-components: 1
  1. Alternatively, verify the patch file paths match the source tree by:
  - uses: patch
    with:
      patches: |
        fix-undefined-reference.patch \
        useradd-defaults.patch
      use-git: true

• Explanation: The patch is failing because the path prefixes don't match. The -p1 strip option removes one level of directory prefix from the patch paths, which is commonly needed when patches are created from git repositories. Using use-git: true lets git handle the patch application which can be more forgiving with path matching.

• Additional Notes:

  • The source code is being extracted from a .tar.xz file which might have a different directory structure than what the patch expects
  • The patch appears to be trying to modify lib/alloc.h but can't find the correct path
  • Using git-style patch application can help handle path differences automatically

• References:

Signed-off-by: Batuhan Apaydin <batuhan.apaydin@chainguard.dev>
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Gen AI suggestions to solve the build error:

Based on the build error output, I'll analyze and provide a solution:

• Detected Error: rm: can't remove '/home/build/melange-out/shadow/usr/share/man/man1/groups.*': No such file or directory

• Error Category: Configuration

• Failure Point: Final cleanup step in the pipeline trying to remove man pages

• Root Cause Analysis: The build is failing because it's trying to remove a man page that doesn't exist. This is happening in the pipeline step that removes the groups man page to avoid conflicts with coreutils-doc package.

• Suggested Fix: Modify the pipeline step to make the rm command non-failing by adding the -f flag and checking if the file exists. Change this line:

From:

rm ${{targets.destdir}}/usr/share/man/man1/groups.*

To:

rm -f ${{targets.destdir}}/usr/share/man/man1/groups.* || true

• Explanation: The -f flag makes rm continue even if files don't exist, and the || true ensures the command succeeds even if rm returns a non-zero exit status. This is a common pattern in build systems when dealing with cleanup operations that may or may not need to happen.

• Additional Notes:

  • This is a non-critical error since it's just trying to clean up documentation files
  • The actual package functionality is not affected
  • The error occurs because the man page is already handled differently in the build process

• References:

@octo-sts octo-sts bot closed this Dec 31, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Dec 31, 2024

superseded by #38566

@octo-sts octo-sts bot deleted the wolfictl-8aced7d4-4dc1-4808-8df7-c91157bdcdee branch January 1, 2025 00:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automated pr request-version-update request for a newer version of a package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants