Skip to content

include performance #216

Answered by wlav
mathieu-lacage asked this question in Q&A
Feb 11, 2024 · 3 comments · 3 replies
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Yes, I'm afraid so. There have been several times that upstream has promised better, but none of the proposed solutions were portable and workable. I've been parroting their promises, but now feel silly making them as I wasn't able to keep them. And now the last they recommended was that I should make it easier for developers to add to the PCH... I haven't done that yet, b/c one of the neat things about modules, would be the ability to have different preprocessor defines and/or compiler flags. This would especially be important for projects that have their header files nicely organized.

Anyway, you'll find in the cppyy_backend directory in your site-packages location the directories etc/d…

Replies: 3 comments 3 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@mathieu-lacage
Comment options

@mathieu-lacage
Comment options

@mathieu-lacage
Comment options

Answer selected by mathieu-lacage
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants