-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 736
DateTimePicker - support light-date package (can replace moment) #2544
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
M-i-k-e-l
wants to merge
3
commits into
master
from
feat/date-time-picker-support-light-date-package
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
let LightDatePackage: typeof import('light-date') | undefined; | ||
try { | ||
LightDatePackage = require('light-date'); | ||
} catch (error) {} | ||
|
||
export default LightDatePackage; |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that the advantage of using light-date is that we can install it as regular dependency (like lodash) and just use it.
If I remember correctly, users didn't want moment because it's a heavy dependency. We don't need to worry about it with light-date.
I would just swap the packages and use it directly instead of moment (and get rid of moment all together)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a problem because users (and us) will need to change the
dateFormat
`timeFormat` - you can see in the example screen it is very different; moreover it might give different results which will need UX approval.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm I see your point. In that case, should we consider having a different API for the formatter?
maybe some sort of a function prop that formats the value? this way each can do whatever and we can set the default behavior (using moment or whatever) in private uilib. WDYT?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if that's what you meant but we can remove (deprecate) all four formatting props (
dateFormat
,timeFormat
,dateFormatter
,timeFormatter
) and introduce a single oneformatter
here:This will eliminate any need for dependencies.
Unless you know why we should keep the two formatter types separated (the user knows what mode they're in).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But can you have a single formatter for all types of values? (date, time,...)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does DateTimePicker inherits all TextField props? You mean there's a name conflict?
Maybe call it
dateTimeFormatter
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it extends it and passes them all.
I thought about it, I don't like it as much and was hoping you'll say that probably no one is using
formatter
:)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess no one does, but not sure I want to go into an adventure of name conflicts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, do we want to add a TODO to change to
formatter
in the next major version or not?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think just leave it for now.. it's not crucial
Let's add the new prop and push this PR forward