WIP - web demo app

[OrenZak]

Description

Create basic web support, and a demo app to showcase the support of current state.

Changelog

• Added new package -> webDemo
• using a snapshot version of this branch, cuz i've changed few files to be able to render on web.

[ethanshar]

@OrenZak
Can you explain a little, why do we need all of the files under src/blur? It appears you created a web alternative for the blur-view library, is that right?

Another question, what's the purpose of all the components under src/webComs?

[OrenZak]

@OrenZak Can you explain a little, why do we need all of the files under src/blur? It appears you created a web alternative for the blur-view library, is that right?

Another question, what's the purpose of all the components under src/webComs?

1. we need that because they are missing web support, and its a dependency you have. so i created this folder as a polyfill to the blur lib.

2. webComps, are just demo components i used, so they are using the components with some data

[ethanshar]

@OrenZak Can you explain a little, why do we need all of the files under src/blur? It appears you created a web alternative for the blur-view library, is that right?
Another question, what's the purpose of all the components under src/webComs?

1. we need that because they are missing web support, and its a dependency you have. so i created this folder as a polyfill to the blur lib.
2. webComps, are just demo components i used, so they are using the components with some data

As for 1, we use the "blur" package optionally. Only in specific cases, is there a real reason to polyfill it, can't we ignore the relevant feature while on Web?
For example here, you can see we only use the blur package only when the enableBlur is passed. IMO, we can just ignore such props on Web, WDYT?

[OrenZak]

@OrenZak Can you explain a little, why do we need all of the files under src/blur? It appears you created a web alternative for the blur-view library, is that right?
Another question, what's the purpose of all the components under src/webComs?

1. we need that because they are missing web support, and its a dependency you have. so i created this folder as a polyfill to the blur lib.
2. webComps, are just demo components i used, so they are using the components with some data

As for 1, we use the "blur" package optionally. Only in specific cases, is there a real reason to polyfill it, can't we ignore the relevant feature while on Web? For example here, you can see we only use the blur package only when the enableBlur is passed. IMO, we can just ignore such props on Web, WDYT?

i think that we will need to support blur for web.
we can ignore for now i guess.

[ethanshar]

i think that we will need to support blur for web. we can ignore for now i guess.

Let's ignore it and remove its code. I don't want to maintain a web implementation for another library

[ethanshar]

i think that we will need to support blur for web. we can ignore for now i guess.

Let's ignore it and remove its code. I don't want to maintain a web implementation for another library

@OrenZak Are you planning to handle this one?

[OrenZak]

i think that we will need to support blur for web. we can ignore for now i guess.

Let's ignore it and remove its code. I don't want to maintain a web implementation for another library

@OrenZak Are you planning to handle this one?

yes, will do.