-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(astro): handle symlinked content collection directories #11236
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 35d50f6 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Hm. Looks like it's broken with caching. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few nits, otherwise it looks good!
packages/astro/src/content/utils.ts
Outdated
const contentDirEntries = await fsMod.promises.readdir(contentDir, { withFileTypes: true }); | ||
for (const entry of contentDirEntries) { | ||
if (entry.isSymbolicLink()) { | ||
const entryPath = path.join(contentDirPath, entry.name); | ||
const realPath = await fsMod.promises.realpath(entryPath); | ||
contentPaths.set(normalizePath(realPath), entry.name); | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: file system operations can come with runtime errors (permissions, etc.), I tend to wrap these operations in a try/catch
to be more safe
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. As a rule, would you silently ignore any errors there, log a warning, or fail the build?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd lean towards silently ignoring them here, because we're just looking for symlinks and a failure probably means it's not a symlink.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It really depends on the use case, really. In this case we could just ignore the error, and maybe log and error/warning using the logger (you should have access to it).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where would I find a logger instance? I'm calling this in vite-plugin-content-imports.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems we don't pass it down to this plugin (the logger arrived after this plugin was created). You'll have to pass it like in this case:
astro/packages/astro/src/core/create-vite.ts
Line 149 in 2851b0a
astroInjectEnvTsPlugin({ settings, logger, fs }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aha, thanks. I just pushed an update with error handling and renamed funciton, but no logging. I'll add the logs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I've added logging now
packages/astro/src/content/utils.ts
Outdated
return contentPaths; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export function reverseSymlinks({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: reverseSymlinks
-> reverseSymlink
singular, because it returns a string
, and not a stringp[]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason I did the plural is because there are multiple symlinks. But I can see what you mean.
Co-authored-by: Emanuele Stoppa <my.burning@gmail.com>
Changes
Currently if you try to use a symlink in a content collection directory it will break the build. This is because Vite resolves the path to the symlink target, which is then outside of the content directory.
This PR tracks symlinks in the content directory, and then reverses them when transforming the content. This works out as a more robust way than intercepting the module resolution, which seemed to break many things in various places.
Fixes #9088
Testing
Adds fixtures and test cases with symlinks
Docs
This should be documented. I'm not sure if we document the limitation currently. This only supports symlinks at the top level (i.e. the link is
src/content/blog -> /Path/to/real/content/blog
).