Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: enable editable app lock toggle (WPB-5610) #2262

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry pick from the original PR:


⚠️ Conflicts during cherry-pick:


PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

  • The PR Title

    • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
    • contains a reference JIRA issue number like
    • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³
  • The PR Description

    • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

What's new in this PR?

Issues

When private users started the app there was no value from and was always returning thus not enabling the user to toggle in settings

Solutions

Invert the value provided from the in the usecase

Testing

How to Test

Testing will be available in AR PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the cherry-pick PR is cherry-picking changes from another banch label Nov 24, 2023
@alexandreferris alexandreferris requested review from a team, yamilmedina, borichellow, MohamadJaara, mchenani and ohassine and removed request for a team November 24, 2023 11:18
Copy link
Contributor Author

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2023

Unit Test Results

   348 files   - 130     348 suites   - 130   8s ⏱️ - 2m 20s
1 879 tests  - 781  1 849 ✔️  - 707  30 💤  - 74  0 ±0 

Results for commit bde973b. ± Comparison against base commit ecf25d0.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2262 (bde973b) into develop (ecf25d0) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #2262      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      57.93%   57.92%   -0.01%     
  Complexity        21       21              
=============================================
  Files           1085     1085              
  Lines          41090    41090              
  Branches        3806     3806              
=============================================
- Hits           23805    23802       -3     
- Misses         15657    15659       +2     
- Partials        1628     1629       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
.../feature/featureConfig/IsAppLockEditableUseCase.kt 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ecf25d0...bde973b. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-wireapp
Copy link

datadog-wireapp bot commented Nov 24, 2023

Datadog Report

All test runs 08c2cc0 🔗

2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 0 with New Flaky, 2 Passed

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Wall Time Branch View
kalium-ios 0 0 0 1849 30 9.01s Link
kalium-jvm 0 0 0 2556 104 7m 15.06s Link

@mchenani mchenani added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 27, 2023
Merged via the queue into develop with commit cec7bbd Nov 27, 2023
17 checks passed
@mchenani mchenani deleted the fix/enable_editable_app_lock_toggle-cherry-pick branch November 27, 2023 09:36
augustocdias pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
* fix: enable editable app lock toggle when there is storage failure as data not found for first time (#2258)

* empty trigger commit

---------

Co-authored-by: Alexandre Ferris <ferris.alexandre@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yamil Medina <yamilmedina@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants