-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix typos and extra code #5
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alexbaumgertner
commented
Dec 9, 2016
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ | |||
background-position:center; | |||
flex: 1; | |||
justify-content: center; | |||
align-items: center; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
duplicate of line 35
Thanks! Though I do prefer the comma dangle when working with data :) |
Thank you for great open source javascript course! |
jdhines
added a commit
to jdhines/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2016
YuriBrunetto
pushed a commit
to YuriBrunetto/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2016
Carrigan
pushed a commit
to Carrigan/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2016
jdstein1
pushed a commit
to jdstein1/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2016
macuk
added a commit
to macuk/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2016
razvanh
pushed a commit
to razvanh/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2016
rustamyusupov
added a commit
to rustamyusupov/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2016
GPFAFF
pushed a commit
to GPFAFF/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2017
kdipaolo
added a commit
to kdipaolo/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2017
santospatrick
pushed a commit
to santospatrick/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2017
mokahaiku
pushed a commit
to mokahaiku/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2017
LeiG
added a commit
to LeiG/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2017
ShimmiChristo
added a commit
to ShimmiChristo/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2017
JeffDess
added a commit
to JeffDess/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2017
austinjreilly
added a commit
to austinjreilly/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2017
Closed
PabloContreras
added a commit
to PabloContreras/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2018
mmoroney01
added a commit
to mmoroney01/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2018
mancristiana
added a commit
to mancristiana/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2018
smchenrybc
added a commit
to smchenrybc/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2018
Watson6982
added a commit
to lgss/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2018
SAToth
pushed a commit
to SAToth/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2018
fix wesbos#4: correct some inconsistencies with closing tags
ianjmacintosh
added a commit
to ianjmacintosh/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2019
At first I was just going through the exercises and preparing to commit at the very end when everything was fixed, but then I was thinking it'd be neat to show my progress from start to finish of me coming up with a good answer. I started thinking of doing this (committing bad answers) on problem 4 because I tried a few approaches that demonstrated a poor understanding of `Array.prototype.reduce()` -- specifically around the initialValue that should be provided as its second argument. Then I got caught with a misunderstanding around arrow functions! I expected that if my function body were on a new line, so long as the function _itself_ were just one line, it'd return the value and I could omit the explicit `return` statement. I didn't identify the turning points, but now that I write this out, I think it'd be _really_ good for me to make a note of what happened that made me understand better enough to fix my mistakes. In looking back, I think the first turning point was stopping to acknowledge I was confused and looking to the video tutorial's example instead of continuing to "try things." Before I "gave up" I tried simplifying my function to simply increment a variable and return it for each iteration. When that didn't work as expected, I consulted MDN's documentation and learned about the function signature for `Array.prototype.reduce()` -- specfically that it took two arguments: a callback and an "initialValue". When I was surprised the value didn't come back as expected ("undefined" instead of 12), I got confused and pointlessly tried to change some of the specifics around invocation. I moved the reducer function into its own variable. But I was just moving a bad function around, since the issue was with the function syntax itself, specifically that it was on two lines, which made it so it did not implicitly return a value, and I wasn't explicitly calling the `return` statement. So my problem didn't change at all, it just moved. And at that point I was also working in a syntax I disliked -- having the reducer function broken out into its own variable instead of calling it inline. I began to resent my own code and fell into a Dostoevskian hell of self-loathing. (Okay, maybe not, but it distracted me.) I tried logging things in the function, and although it's tough to identify what made me start doing it, I called `return` in the function body and started seeing things change. Eventually I got myself back on track. Notes on the failed solution to exercise 5: At this point, I've tried tackling the problem in just one line very similarly to how I'm solving in exercise 3. This returns an array of "[object Object]"s which is totally not what I'm going for. I think what's happening is the type is being coerced to a string by the backticks. I bet if I break this out into its own console log, it will preserve the data as an object.
tiago-m-dias
added a commit
to tiago-m-dias/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2019
Challenge wesbos#5
n3218
added a commit
to n3218/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2019
44thm0820
added a commit
to 44thm0820/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2019
Laryl14
pushed a commit
to Laryl14/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2020
Laryl14
pushed a commit
to Laryl14/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2020
AlexJoeb
pushed a commit
to AlexJoeb/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2020
sylvain-farnault
added a commit
to sylvain-farnault/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2020
rachelrly
added a commit
to rachelrly/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2020
Personal image gallery in JS30 wesbos#5
astroud
added a commit
to astroud/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2020
LHJE
referenced
this pull request
in LHJE/JavaScript30
Nov 28, 2020
DeonJordaan
added a commit
to DeonJordaan/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2021
bhaveshgoyal182
pushed a commit
to bhaveshgoyal182/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2021
pinkx-xlink
added a commit
to pinkx-xlink/javascript30
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2023
bSkinny2
pushed a commit
to bSkinny2/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Add more granular instructions
ntw3001
added a commit
to ntw3001/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
tomech4
added a commit
to tomech4/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2024
anicodes404
pushed a commit
to anicodes404/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2024
rndall
added a commit
to rndall/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2024
rndall
added a commit
to rndall/JavaScript30
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix typos, missing/extra semicolon, duplicate css declaration.