config_files: Do not remove chcon in runtime cleanup

[elkoniu]

chcon is being used by the bootc and recently added to bootc.spec file as an explicite requirement: bootc-dev/bootc#1391 When it is not presented in the system the result is failure of the bootc install to-filesystem command used by Anaconda installer.

[elkoniu]

Related bootc + anaconda discussion: bootc-dev/bootc#1383

[jkonecny12]

Looks good to me.

[jkonecny12]

offtopic: I just wonder, I see /usr/bin/[ on the same line and it doesn't look as a smart idea to remove this to me. @bcl do you know why it's removed?

[elkoniu]

offtopic: I just wonder, I see /usr/bin/[ on the same line and it doesn't look as a smart idea to remove this to me. @bcl do you know why it's removed?

To be honest I am wondering how everything is able to work with /usr/bin/[ removed :)

[bcl]

Thanks!

[bcl]

To be honest I am wondering how everything is able to work with /usr/bin/[ removed :)

I expect that the shell handles it, the reasons for its removal are lost in the mists of time (I went back as far as commit bd476e1). I expect it was carried over from the old way of building things which used to use a pile of bash scripts in the anaconda repo.

We could stop removing it, but not without doing a bunch of tests first to make sure THAT doesn't break :)

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16025506060

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 43.417%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 15914943807:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	1634
Relevant Lines:	3562

---

💛 - Coveralls