Correcting output log

[vsmahesh]

Output log has been updated to match what is been displayed in the console when followed the steps mentioned.

Results I am seeing when followed the article is:

~/Projects/js/webpack-demo
$ webpack
Hash: ea8bef37f3fc13f92afb
Version: webpack 3.0.0
Time: 658ms
    Asset    Size  Chunks                    Chunk Names
bundle.js  544 kB       0  [emitted]  [big]  main
   [0] ./src/index.js 219 bytes {0} [built]
   [2] (webpack)/buildin/global.js 509 bytes {0} [built]
   [3] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 517 bytes {0} [built]
    + 1 hidden module
~/Projects/js/webpack-demo

[jsf-clabot]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[skipjack]

./src/index.js is already mentioned at the bottom of these three examples so either that should be replaced with the + 1 hidden module or we should re-evaluate these changes. I see you're on version 3 which is probably why the output is slightly different. I think maybe we should just add a warning at the top of this guide or in /guides/index.md to indicate that output might vary between versions of webpack -- trying to always keep these up to date will not be easy.

cc @TheDutchCoder

[vsmahesh]

I am using webpack 3.0.0. I assumed that the output log will always start with the entry file. It is a logical assumption; isn't it? If that is not the case or it can't be guaranteed, a generic guide line as you have mentioned will do.

[skipjack]

Yeah, and I think that's ok -- but we'd need to update the whole diff in this case not just the first module (see my comment above).

[vsmahesh]

See the index of files in output; it is 0, 2, 3! I believe we should go with the generic guiding statement that would cover any such discrepancy.

Hash: ea8bef37f3fc13f92afb
Version: webpack 3.0.0
Time: 658ms
    Asset    Size  Chunks                    Chunk Names
bundle.js  544 kB       0  [emitted]  [big]  main
   [0] ./src/index.js 219 bytes {0} [built]
   [2] (webpack)/buildin/global.js 509 bytes {0} [built]
   [3] (webpack)/buildin/module.js 517 bytes {0} [built]
    + 1 hidden module

[skipjack]

Yeah maybe [1] is the hidden module.

I believe we should go with the generic guiding statement that would cover any such discrepancy.

Sure would you like to add this statement or should I close this PR and open a separate one to update /guides/index (and maybe /guides/getting-started).

[vsmahesh]

Please go ahead.

Thank you