Skip to content

chore: run cancel workflow on pull request #458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

ersachin3112
Copy link
Contributor

@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 commented Sep 19, 2022

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

run cancel workflow on pull request of external contributor

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 92.20% // Head: 92.20% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (70c343c) compared to base (7dd065c).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #458   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.20%   92.20%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         590      590           
  Branches      190      190           
=======================================
  Hits          544      544           
  Misses         37       37           
  Partials        9        9           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@snitin315 snitin315 merged commit 37d2073 into webpack-contrib:master Sep 19, 2022
@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 deleted the update-cancel-workflow branch October 2, 2022 02:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants