chore(coderabbit): create .coderabbit.yaml

[sreenara]

Create coderabbitai yaml file to configure CodeRabbitAI

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new configuration file .coderabbit.yaml that establishes comprehensive settings for a software project's development and review processes. The configuration encompasses multiple aspects of project management, including language settings, review workflows, and tool integrations. It defines specific parameters for code quality checks, enabling various linting and analysis tools across different programming languages and frameworks. The file provides granular control over review processes, including options for summarizing changes, managing commit statuses, and configuring automated chat responses. Additionally, the configuration includes settings for knowledge base scoping and potential integrations with project management platforms, aiming to streamline the development workflow and enhance code review efficiency.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

.coderabbit.yaml (2)

1-4: Consider adding tone instructions for more personalized reviews.

The tone_instructions field is currently empty. Adding specific tone instructions can help customize the review style to match your team's communication preferences.

---

26-27: Consider adding path filters and instructions for targeted reviews.

The path_filters and path_instructions arrays are empty. Adding path-specific configurations can help:

• Focus reviews on critical code areas
• Apply different review strategies for different types of files
• Customize review depth based on file location

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c44bc19 and 33a1bed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: setup_test_release

🔇 Additional comments (3)

.coderabbit.yaml (3)

95-98: Review integration settings for Jira and Linear.

The configuration includes empty arrays for Jira project_keys and Linear team_keys. If you're using either of these tools:

1. Add the relevant project/team keys to enable integration
2. If these integrations aren't used, consider removing these sections to maintain a cleaner configuration

---

1-100: Verify YAML syntax and schema.

While the configuration appears well-structured, let's validate it:

✅ Verification successful

YAML validation successful with minor style suggestion

The YAML syntax is valid. Consider adding --- at the start of the file to follow YAML best practices, but this is optional and won't affect functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Validate YAML syntax
yamllint .coderabbit.yaml

# Check if all required fields are present
yq eval '.reviews' .coderabbit.yaml > /dev/null
yq eval '.tools' .coderabbit.yaml > /dev/null

Length of output: 369

---

36-86: Review and selectively enable relevant tools.

All static analysis tools are currently enabled. Consider:

1. Enabling only tools relevant to your project's tech stack
2. Disabling tools that might generate noise or false positives
3. Reviewing if the default configurations (timeout, levels) are appropriate

For example, if your project doesn't use PHP, Ruby, or Swift, you can disable phpstan, rubocop, and swiftlint respectively.

Let's check which languages are actually used in your project:

✅ Verification successful

Disable tools not relevant to your JavaScript/React project

Based on the codebase analysis, keep only these relevant tools:

• eslint, biome (JavaScript/React)
• markdownlint (documentation)
• yamllint (configuration files)
• github-checks (CI integration)
• gitleaks, semgrep (security)

You can safely disable:

• Language-specific tools: shellcheck, ruff, swiftlint, phpstan, golangci-lint, rubocop, buf, detekt, pmd, cppcheck
• Other tools: regal, circleci, languagetool

This will reduce noise and improve review focus.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all file extensions to determine used languages
find . -type f -name '*.*' | sed -n 's/.*\.\([^.]*\)$/\1/p' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr

Length of output: 447

[sreenara]

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.28.1 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀