Skip to content

Conversation

@iiio2
Copy link
Member

@iiio2 iiio2 commented Jan 27, 2026

I think we do not need this in readme to mention ai driven development specifically.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Removed AI-First Development documentation block from README, including onboarding steps and example guidance.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Removed AI-First Development section from README.
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 27, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
v4 Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 27, 2026 4:40am

@iiio2 iiio2 requested a review from razbakov January 27, 2026 04:36
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request removes a 24-line documentation block from README.md describing AI-First Development practices, including onboarding steps and example prompts. No code changes were made; only instructional content was deleted.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
README.md
Removed "AI-First Development" documentation block (24 lines deleted), including onboarding guidance and example prompts

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A gentle rabbit hops along the path,
Tidying up the words with care,
Some chapters fade, yet wisdom still remains,
The burrow grows more neat and spare,
Simpler docs, a lighter load to bear! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'docs: update readme' is vague and generic; it doesn't specifically convey that the change removes the 'AI-First Development' section from the README. Use a more descriptive title such as 'docs: remove AI-First Development section from README' to clearly indicate what was changed.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants