wip: pushing to talk structure with @ttd #174
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
| <PropertyGroup> | ||
| <OutputType>Exe</OutputType> | ||
| <TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework> | ||
| <ImplicitUsings>enable</ImplicitUsings> |
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
| <DockerComposeProjectPath>..\docker-compose.dcproj</DockerComposeProjectPath> | ||
| </PropertyGroup> | ||
|
|
||
| <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)'=='Release'"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if it would be worth using configurations more liberally so dockerfiles, workflows, etc. could just pass configurations and the meanings could be contained in a propertygroup like this.
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
Comment on lines
+4
to
+28
| namespace Peer.Daemon.Linux | ||
| { | ||
| internal class Program | ||
| { | ||
| private const string _socketPath = "/var/run/peerless/peerless.sock"; | ||
| static async Task Main() | ||
| { | ||
| Directory.CreateDirectory(Directory.GetParent(_socketPath)!.FullName); | ||
| File.Delete(_socketPath); | ||
|
|
||
| var app = ServerBuilder.CreateHost(cfg => | ||
| { | ||
| cfg.WebHost.UseKestrel(kestrel => | ||
| { | ||
| kestrel.ListenUnixSocket(_socketPath, opts => | ||
| { | ||
| opts.Protocols = HttpProtocols.Http2; | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| await app.RunAsync(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| namespace Peer.Daemon.Linux | |
| { | |
| internal class Program | |
| { | |
| private const string _socketPath = "/var/run/peerless/peerless.sock"; | |
| static async Task Main() | |
| { | |
| Directory.CreateDirectory(Directory.GetParent(_socketPath)!.FullName); | |
| File.Delete(_socketPath); | |
| var app = ServerBuilder.CreateHost(cfg => | |
| { | |
| cfg.WebHost.UseKestrel(kestrel => | |
| { | |
| kestrel.ListenUnixSocket(_socketPath, opts => | |
| { | |
| opts.Protocols = HttpProtocols.Http2; | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| await app.RunAsync(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| namespace Peer.Daemon.Linux; | |
| internal class Program | |
| { | |
| private const string _socketPath = "/var/run/peerless/peerless.sock"; | |
| static async Task Main() | |
| { | |
| Directory.CreateDirectory(Directory.GetParent(_socketPath)!.FullName); | |
| File.Delete(_socketPath); | |
| var app = ServerBuilder.CreateHost(cfg => | |
| { | |
| cfg.WebHost.UseKestrel(kestrel => | |
| { | |
| kestrel.ListenUnixSocket(_socketPath, opts => | |
| { | |
| opts.Protocols = HttpProtocols.Http2; | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| await app.RunAsync(); | |
| } | |
| } |
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
| static async Task Main() | ||
| { | ||
| Directory.CreateDirectory(Directory.GetParent(_socketPath)!.FullName); | ||
| File.Delete(_socketPath); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would this blow up an already running instance if a second one were started? I wonder if it would better to be aggressive about cleanup and fail to start if the socket is already open? I bet there's prior art about this somewhere.
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
| using Grpc.Net.Client; | ||
| using Peerless; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Geas; |
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
| // package peerless; | ||
|
|
||
| service PullRequestGrpcService { | ||
| rpc GetPullRequest(GetPullRequestRequest) returns (GetPullRequestResponse); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
RequestRequest 🤮 I get it though.
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
| message State { | ||
| PRStatus status = 1; | ||
| int32 total_comments = 2; | ||
| int32 active_comments =3; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| int32 active_comments =3; | |
| int32 active_comments =3; |
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
Comment on lines
+31
to
+32
| var src = host.Services.GetRequiredService<EndpointDataSource>(); | ||
| return host; |
ttd2089
reviewed
Sep 19, 2023
| } | ||
|
|
||
| //Linux | ||
| public partial class SpecialPaths |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This doesn't compile conditionally, wouldn't these paths end up being used on Windows too?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just an initial experimenting branch I've had around for a bit where I'm trying to see how I wanna structure the Daemon stuff.
I've got separate projects for the Windows and linux daemons because I wanted to test if it would cause any differences with trimming etc. It doesn't seem to have any impact so I'll be merging them together again and probably going to nuke the Server project entirely.
Other than that I'm basically thinking of just using named pipes on windows and UDS on linux/mac to do IPC and then just polling in the background as we do now to populate a teeny SQLite server that we update. I figure it'd be kinda neat to do it with change streaming and tracking certain things though it's kinda hard because the GH api makes so few promises to you about the actual correctness of your data (looking at you status flags)
In order to do a bunch of this I had to bump to net 8 and preview versions (for named pipe support in kestrel). Also I added some really horrendous annotations on the generics to make them compatible with the trimming stuff but god I hope there's a better way to do it going forward. Those required C#11 to work properly.
edit: Oh also I was experimenting with the CodeGenerator configuration stuff but it wasn't working for me so I have it gated behind the Release-Preview build which I don't think I actually added atm.
edit2: I also added a little commandline util called 'Geas' to handle experimenting with it before implementing it in Peer