Skip to content

Benchmarking Blockchain Data Availability: Polkadot ELVES vs Modular DA Layers #2578

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2025

Conversation

prasad-kumkar
Copy link
Contributor

Project Abstract

We propose a comprehensive research study comparing the data availability (DA) mechanisms of Polkadot’s integrated availability protocol (used in ELVES) with those of leading blockchain DA schemes like Celestia, Avail, Espresso's Tiramisu, and NEAR. Our goal is to evaluate and benchmark these systems on key performance, security, and efficiency metrics, such as bandwidth usage, latency, light-client trust assumptions, and validator resource overhead. We will use real network telemetry from Polkadot/Kusama, Celestia mainnet, Avail testnet, and other platforms, along with protocol analysis and reproducible experiments, to generate a detailed and objective comparison.

The research will deliver a deeply technical report, open-source benchmarking tools, and curated datasets, all licensed openly under Apache-2.0 and CC BY 4.0. The findings will inform protocol developers, parachain teams, and researchers about the strengths and trade-offs of each approach, and highlight Polkadot's positioning in a growing ecosystem of modular and scalable blockchain architectures. We also propose optional dissemination via an interactive dashboard, tutorial videos, and blog posts to maximize the accessibility and long-term value of the research.

This proposal is in response to the Research Task shared by W3F.

Grant level

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (project_name.md).
  • I have read the application guidelines.
  • Payment details have been provided (Polkadot AssetHub (USDC & DOT) address in the application and bank details via email, if applicable).
  • I understand that an agreed upon percentage of each milestone will be paid in vested DOT, to the Polkadot address listed in the application.
  • I am aware that, in order to receive a grant, I (and the entity I represent) have to successfully complete a KYC/KYB check.
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).
  • I prefer the discussion of this application to take place in a private Element/Matrix channel. My username is: @prasad-kumkar:matrix.org (change the homeserver if you use a different one)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 20, 2025

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@github-actions github-actions bot added the admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. label Jun 20, 2025
@prasad-kumkar
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

@semuelle semuelle added the discussion private Discussion of application happens in private. label Jun 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 24, 2025

The applicant has requested the discussion of the application to happen in a private chat room.

@semuelle semuelle self-assigned this Jun 25, 2025
@semuelle semuelle added the ready for review The project is ready to be reviewed by the committee members. label Jul 2, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@keeganquigley keeganquigley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am willing to approve. In the meantime can you please fill out KYC/KYB verification? Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@semuelle semuelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@semuelle semuelle merged commit 0905e0d into w3f:master Jul 10, 2025
11 of 16 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations and welcome to the Web3 Foundation Grants Program! Please refer to our Milestone Delivery repository for instructions on how to submit milestones and invoices, our FAQ for frequently asked questions and the support section on our website for more ways to find answers to your questions.

Before you start, take a moment to read through our announcement guidelines for all communications related to the grant or make them known to the right person in your organisation. In particular, please don't announce the grant publicly before at least the first milestone of your project has been approved. At that point or shortly before, you can get in touch with us at grantsPR@web3.foundation and we'll be happy to collaborate on an announcement about the work you’re doing.

Also, if you haven't yet, consider signing up for the Polkadot Alpha Program. The program offers plenty of resources for people building on Polkadot. Lastly, please remember to let us know in case you run into any delays or deviate from the deliverables in your application. You can either leave a comment here or directly request to amend your application via PR. We wish you luck with your project! 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. discussion private Discussion of application happens in private. ready for review The project is ready to be reviewed by the committee members.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants