-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
Benchmarking Blockchain Data Availability: Polkadot ELVES vs Modular DA Layers #2578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement. |
The applicant has requested the discussion of the application to happen in a private chat room. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am willing to approve. In the meantime can you please fill out KYC/KYB verification? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Congratulations and welcome to the Web3 Foundation Grants Program! Please refer to our Milestone Delivery repository for instructions on how to submit milestones and invoices, our FAQ for frequently asked questions and the support section on our website for more ways to find answers to your questions. |
Project Abstract
We propose a comprehensive research study comparing the data availability (DA) mechanisms of Polkadot’s integrated availability protocol (used in ELVES) with those of leading blockchain DA schemes like Celestia, Avail, Espresso's Tiramisu, and NEAR. Our goal is to evaluate and benchmark these systems on key performance, security, and efficiency metrics, such as bandwidth usage, latency, light-client trust assumptions, and validator resource overhead. We will use real network telemetry from Polkadot/Kusama, Celestia mainnet, Avail testnet, and other platforms, along with protocol analysis and reproducible experiments, to generate a detailed and objective comparison.
The research will deliver a deeply technical report, open-source benchmarking tools, and curated datasets, all licensed openly under Apache-2.0 and CC BY 4.0. The findings will inform protocol developers, parachain teams, and researchers about the strengths and trade-offs of each approach, and highlight Polkadot's positioning in a growing ecosystem of modular and scalable blockchain architectures. We also propose optional dissemination via an interactive dashboard, tutorial videos, and blog posts to maximize the accessibility and long-term value of the research.
This proposal is in response to the Research Task shared by W3F.
Grant level
Application Checklist
project_name.md
).@prasad-kumkar:matrix.org
(change the homeserver if you use a different one)