Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss multi-party consent #24

Closed
jyasskin opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Discuss multi-party consent #24

jyasskin opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
agenda+ Add to the next call's agenda. write me

Comments

@jyasskin
Copy link
Collaborator

Not feasible to get this consent in many cases, but some examples where more people are involved than just the end-user:

  • Sharing my contacts reveals private information about the people in my contacts.
  • Sharing my browsing history or information aggregated from it reveals information about the websites I visited.
  • Sharing details of my life reveals information about people similar to me.
@dmarti
Copy link
Collaborator

dmarti commented Aug 21, 2021

Another example of a multi-party problem is the case where the user is consenting to use of their information by a controller that has information on lots of other people, and the valuable data is in the negative space -- people who do not have a particular quality.

For example, if a user builds a profile on an ad-supported social site that reveals their interest in double-entry accounting, that information helps target investment scam ads that have a higher response rate among users with low accounting knowledge.

There is some kind of common problem here, where the user might want to disclose that they are a member of a high-information or high-status group, in order to push risks away from themselves and toward non-members of the group.

@darobin darobin added the agenda+ Add to the next call's agenda. label Jan 5, 2022
@darobin
Copy link
Member

darobin commented Jul 6, 2022

Related to #135.

This is group consent (under one form) and not multi-party consent. It's related to the section on group privacy but from the other angle.

@darobin darobin added write me and removed agenda+ Add to the next call's agenda. labels Jul 6, 2022
@npdoty
Copy link
Collaborator

npdoty commented Jul 6, 2022

I think this might be more commonly described as privacy of people other than the user. (Not always just about consent, either.)

There's also some related existing text about group privacy.

@torgo torgo assigned npdoty and unassigned darobin Jun 21, 2023
@darobin darobin added the agenda+ Add to the next call's agenda. label Jun 21, 2023
npdoty added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2023
related to #135

add principle to consent section to note that consent does not include
non-user, and that functionality must be provided to access or remove data
in those cases
darobin added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2023
…uploaded by others (#287)

* addresses #24

related to #135

add principle to consent section to note that consent does not include
non-user, and that functionality must be provided to access or remove data
in those cases

* Apply suggestions from code review

accepting inline suggestions (other changes to be made in a separate commit just for workflow reasons)

Co-authored-by: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>

* re-wording about consent implying consent of non-user
formatting

---------

Co-authored-by: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
@darobin
Copy link
Member

darobin commented Jun 30, 2023

Fixed by #287. (@npdoty used "addresses" instead of "fixes" so it didn't auto-close)

@darobin darobin closed this as completed Jun 30, 2023
@npdoty
Copy link
Collaborator

npdoty commented Jun 30, 2023

haha, Nick's careful verbosity strikes again

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
agenda+ Add to the next call's agenda. write me
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants