CSS contain-intrinsic-size

[vmpstr]

Hello TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

• Name: CSS intrinsic-size
• Specification URL: https://wicg.github.io/display-locking/contain-intrinsic-size.html
• Explainer: https://github.com/WICG/display-locking/blob/master/explainer-contain-intrinsic-size.md
• Tests: will be css/css-intrinsic-size, but currently not yet implemented
• Primary contacts: @vmpstr @tabatkins @chrishtr (authors)

Further details:

• Relevant time constraints or deadlines: None
• I have read and filled out the Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy. The assessment is here.
• I have reviewed the TAG's API Design Principles
• The group where the work on this specification is: csswg

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

• open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback
• open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review
• leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify primary contacts

[torgo]

Just a quick process question: why is this explainer in the WICG and the work is going on in CSS? Thanks.

[vmpstr]

This feature was initially a part of display-locking, which is a WICG project. We've decided that it made sense on its own, as part of CSSWG. However, the explainer remained in display-locking WICG repo. Hopefully that's not an issue.

[dbaron]

I think from a TAG perspective this is fine. I was a little concerned that the early proposals were too narrow (and creating a new CSS property for something very specific when it could have been more general), but what is now specified is now more general as I was hoping.

I did give some additional feedback from my perspective as a CSS WG participant, but I don't think of that as an issue that the TAG should be concerned about.

[torgo]

We discussed briefly on today's call. Will try to close in 2 weeks at our f2f.