Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a Pass Through command for use by intermediary nodes #825

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shs96c
Copy link
Contributor

@shs96c shs96c commented Mar 1, 2017

This is required to allow an intermediary node to send
commands upstream.


This change is Reviewable

@shs96c
Copy link
Contributor Author

shs96c commented Mar 1, 2017

This is a straw man that I intend to beat into shape using review comments. Be less than gentle.

@shs96c
Copy link
Contributor Author

shs96c commented Mar 1, 2017

Depends on #824 in order to not introduce ReSpec errors.

This is required to allow an intermediary node to send
commands upstream.
this command was called with. How this is done is outside the scope
of this specification.

<p class=issue>Set the headers of the HTTP request.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should just copy them from command to command here.

<li><p>Let <var>data</var> be the result of <a data-lt="json
serialization">serializing as JSON</a> <var>parameters</var>.

<p class=note>This must create a JSON <a>Object</a> that is
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should just call <a>clone an object</a> here that will be passed through

@AutomatedTester
Copy link
Contributor

@shs96c wanna finish this off or close it?

@shs96c
Copy link
Contributor Author

shs96c commented Aug 11, 2017

I do want to finish it.

@andreastt andreastt added this to the Level 2 milestone Aug 23, 2017
@jgraham
Copy link
Member

jgraham commented Nov 6, 2017

Per the testing policy, this PR can't be accepted without a corresponding test in the web-platform-tests repository.

@andreastt
Copy link
Member

@jgraham I’m not sure how easy it is to write tests for this in WPT. How do you envision writing intermediary tests to the current test setup?

I feel like this PR should be accepted in its current form if @shs96c wants to do the work on resolving the conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants