Skip to content

Inconsistency in references between TR drafts and EDs. #1165

Open
@gsnedders

Description

@gsnedders

We should probably be consistent unless we have a good reason not to be. Obviously for REC advancement we need to be referring to TR (sadly!) but we probably generally want to point people towards EDs.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions