Review whether new specs should be in Respec or Bikeshed

[toddreifsteck]

Bikeshed has better link validation mechanics at built time.
Respec is the tool the group has been using.

We should evaluate whether we should change spec tools and what our process is for creating a new spec.

Possible additional issue to cover:

• Snapshot of Last Known Good version of Respec if we stick with it

[tdresser]

@domenic

[annevk]

Not sure if this is too late, but please use Bikeshed. It makes it easier to move things between WHATWG and Web Performance documents as well as deal with cross-spec cross-references, and in general has a slightly better end user experience.

[marcoscaceres]

as deal with cross-spec cross-references,

ReSpec and BikeShed use the same terms database.
http://respec.org/xref/

and in general has a slightly better end user experience.

That's open to debate ;)

But in all seriousness, you can find badly written specs using either tool - it's really a matter of how well people know the tooling and we are working on hopefully making the situation better for both ReSpec and BikeShed.