Soften/expand the advice in the modified note for any-*

Reworded to remove the implication that authors should "ensure" that
"ideally" they take any-* into account...turning it into a "may", which
explains more about the rationale for the existence of these `any-*`
features without seemingly mandating that authors must follow a specific
style/design decision.

mediaqueries/Overview.bs

@@ -1757,14 +1757,15 @@ All Available Interaction Capabilities: the 'any-pointer' and 'any-hover' featur
 	<div class="note">
 	While 'pointer' and 'hover' can be used to design the main style and interaction
 	mode of the page to suit the primary input mechanism, 'any-pointer' and 'any-hover'
-	can be used to ensure that all possible types of pointers available to the user are
-	taken into account.
+	can be used to potentially take into account all possible types of pointers
+	that have been detected.
 
 	Designing a page that relies on hovering or accurate pointing
 	only because 'any-hover' or 'any-pointer' indicate that at least one of the available
 	input mechanisms has these capabilities	is likely to result in a poor experience.
-	Ideally, authors should strive to ensure that their page / application provides
-	appropriate style and functionality for all detected types of input mechanism.
+	However, authors may use this information to inform their decision about the style and
+	functionality they wish to provide based on additional input mechanisms that
+	are available to the user.
 	</div>
 
 	<div class="example">