Skip to content

feat[lang]: allow DynArrays of length 0 - #5234

Open
Sporarum wants to merge 2 commits into
vyperlang:masterfrom
Sporarum:make-0-length
Open

feat[lang]: allow DynArrays of length 0#5234
Sporarum wants to merge 2 commits into
vyperlang:masterfrom
Sporarum:make-0-length

Conversation

@Sporarum

@Sporarum Sporarum commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What I did

Allow DynArrays of length 0, including in user-written annotations
Change the type of [] to DynArray[Never, 0] (was DynArray[Never, 1])

Note: Does not allow Bytes[0] and String[0] (a different PR can do that).

How I did it

Change bounds check on lengths for DynArrays from > to >=

How to verify it

pytest, also see new tests

Commit message

this commit allows DArrayT to have a length of zero, and changes the
type of `[]`  to `DArrayT(BottomT(), 0)` (was `DArrayT(BottomT(), 0)`).

Description for the changelog

Allow DynArray[T, 0] type (which is only inhabited by [])

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Gas Changes

No changes detected.

Summary

  • Total tests measured: 560
  • Changed: 0
  • Regressions (gas up): 0
  • Improvements (gas down): 0
  • New tests: 0
  • Deleted tests: 0
  • Newly failing: 0
  • Newly passing: 0

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6c7cda67d1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread vyper/codegen/ir_node.py
Comment on lines 278 to +280
assert (
isinstance(repeat_bound.value, int) and repeat_bound.value > 0
), f"repeat bound must be a compile-time positive integer: {self.args[2]}"
isinstance(repeat_bound.value, int) and repeat_bound.value >= 0
), f"repeat bound must be a compile-time non-negative integer: {repeat_bound}"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve zero-iteration semantics for VyperIR repeats

Allowing a zero repeat_bound here accepts valid VyperIR such as repeat(i, 0, 0, 0, body), but the legacy lowerer only emits its zero-rounds exit jump when rounds != rounds_bound in vyper/ir/compile_ir.py. For equal literal zero values it enters the do-while body once, so contracts compiled through the documented direct VyperIR path (vyper-ir) execute a zero-iteration loop unexpectedly. Retain the rejection for this form or make the lowerer skip zero rounds unconditionally.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📊 Bytecode Size Changes (venom)

No changes detected.

Full bytecode sizes

Contract legacy-O2 legacy-Os -O2 -O3 -Os
curvefi/legacy/CurveStableSwapMetaNG.vy 24952 23578 19847 19107 18571
curvefi/amm/stableswap/meta_implementation/meta_implementation_v_700.vy 23610 22805 19618 18650 18337
curvefi/amm/stableswap/implementation/implementation_v_700.vy 24962 23769 19237 18382 18038
curvefi/legacy/CurveStableSwapNG.vy 24473 23298 18802 18004 17659
curvefi/amm/tricryptoswap/implementation/implementation_v_200.vy 20724 19959 17250 16689 16325
curvefi/amm/twocryptoswap/implementation/implementation_v_210.vy 17634 16894 14958 14376 14027
yearnfi/VaultV3.vy 19972 19063 14749 13828 13279
curvefi/legacy/CurveCryptoSwap2.vy 18947 18382 14619 14129 13954
yearnfi/VaultV2.vy 16676 15763 13262 12470 12053
curvefi/amm/stableswap/factory/factory_v_100.vy 14558 13978 11864 10792 10892
curvefi/gauge/child_gauge/implementation/implementation_v_110.vy 12338 11561 9840 9213 8824
curvefi/amm/stableswap/views/views_v_120.vy 12784 12368 9705 9059 9294
curvefi/gauge/child_gauge/implementation/implementation_v_100.vy 12017 11249 9573 8953 8567
curvefi/amm/tricryptoswap/math/math_v_200.vy 11189 11126 9029 8144 8170
curvefi/legacy/CurveCryptoMathOptimized3.vy 11188 11125 9028 8144 8170
curvefi/gauge/child_gauge/implementation/implementation_v_020.vy 10665 9947 8685 8129 7743
curvefi/registries/metaregistry/metaregistry_v_110.vy 7590 6732 6491 5710 5603
curvefi/helpers/router/router_v_110.vy 6717 6717 6251 5733 6035
curvefi/amm/tricryptoswap/views/views_v_200.vy 7821 7776 6114 5899 6048
curvefi/helpers/stable_swap_meta_zap/stable_swap_meta_zap_v_100.vy 7302 7067 5878 5351 5611
curvefi/amm/twocryptoswap/views/views_v_200.vy 6991 6946 5685 5484 5619
curvefi/registries/metaregistry/registry_handlers/stableswap/handler_v_110.vy 6633 6259 5533 4695 5238
curvefi/amm/twocryptoswap/math/math_v_210.vy 6800 6800 5506 5012 5039
curvefi/amm/twocryptoswap/factory/factory_v_200.vy 5540 5252 4617 3917 4047
curvefi/amm/tricryptoswap/factory/factory_v_200.vy 5246 5021 4483 3890 4020
curvefi/gauge/child_gauge/factory/factory_v_201.vy 4844 4547 3901 3675 3511
curvefi/registries/metaregistry/registry_handlers/tricryptoswap/handler_v_110.vy 4241 3939 3718 3334 3429
curvefi/registries/metaregistry/registry_handlers/twocryptoswap/handler_v_110.vy 4186 3884 3675 3255 3333
curvefi/gauge/child_gauge/factory/factory_v_100.vy 4183 3914 3408 3144 2971
yearnfi/VaultFactory.vy 3765 3617 3031 2193 2494
curvefi/registries/address_provider/address_provider_v_201.vy 2973 2782 2617 2443 2357
curvefi/helpers/rate_provider/rate_provider_v_101.vy 3260 3260 2544 2272 2305
curvefi/amm/stableswap/math/math_v_100.vy 3067 3046 2457 2252 2309
curvefi/helpers/rate_provider/rate_provider_v_100.vy 2847 2841 2313 1994 2014
curvefi/helpers/deposit_and_stake_zap/deposit_and_stake_zap_v_100.vy 2322 2316 1782 1611 1670
curvefi/governance/relayer/taiko/relayer_v_001.vy 2068 2064 1730 1509 1557
curvefi/governance/relayer/polygon_cdk/relayer_v_101.vy 1556 1523 1530 1324 1347
curvefi/governance/relayer/arb_orbit/relayer_v_101.vy 1266 1262 1242 1066 1115
curvefi/governance/relayer/op_stack/relayer_v_101.vy 1186 1182 1183 1014 1056
curvefi/governance/relayer/not_rollup/relayer_v_100.vy 1168 1153 1174 1011 1037
curvefi/governance/vault/vault_v_100.vy 964 941 862 823 839
curvefi/governance/relayer/relayer_v_100.vy 496 496 593 490 503
curvefi/governance/agent/agent_v_100.vy 541 541 430 402 406
curvefi/governance/agent/agent_v_101.vy 541 541 430 402 406

@charles-cooper charles-cooper left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

excellent!

@harkal

harkal commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Sporarum tests seem to fail under venom

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants