fix: apply receiver conflict policy - #41
Merged
Merged
Conversation
vsamarth
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 26, 2026 02:20
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
RejectandRenamewhen resolving expected destination paths before accept/exportRoot cause
Receiver configuration exposed a conflict policy, but the listener/session/core request path dropped it before normal destination planning. Core then rejected existing destinations directly, so the configured policy never ran.
Impact
Receiver transfers now honor
RejectandRenameend to end.Renameremains the effective default across the existing receive surfaces, and conflicts are resolved before transfer begins.Validation
cargo fmtcargo testCloses #39.
Closes #27.