[WIP] Bump Apache DF to 55 - #9334
Performance Regression: -2.18%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 27 improved benchmarks
❌ 22 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1938 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 42 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices_vortex_buffer[65536] |
121.2 µs | 182.6 µs | -33.64% |
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices_vortex_buffer[16384] |
31.6 µs | 47.1 µs | -32.93% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compact_sliced[(16384, 10)] |
1.4 ms | 2 ms | -28.55% |
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices_vortex_buffer[2048] |
5.4 µs | 7.5 µs | -27.89% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compact_sliced[(4096, 10)] |
385.2 µs | 527.6 µs | -27% |
| ❌ | Simulation | in_place_non_nullable[65536] |
49.2 µs | 66.5 µs | -26.1% |
| ❌ | Simulation | copy_nullable[65536] |
1.3 ms | 1.7 ms | -26.03% |
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices_vortex_buffer[1024] |
3.6 µs | 4.7 µs | -24.29% |
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (10000, 4)] |
318 µs | 403.8 µs | -21.24% |
| ❌ | Simulation | primitive_i64_vortex |
3.3 ms | 4 ms | -18.23% |
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices[(16384, 0.01)] |
13.5 µs | 16.2 µs | -16.7% |
| ❌ | Simulation | div_decimal_i64_nonnull |
942.2 µs | 1,114.9 µs | -15.49% |
| ❌ | WallTime | cuda/bitpacked_u8/unpack/3bw[100M] |
299.2 µs | 350.9 µs | -14.74% |
| ❌ | Simulation | new_raw_prim_test_between[i32, 2048] |
76.7 µs | 88.7 µs | -13.56% |
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices[(16384, 0.1)] |
36.1 µs | 41.8 µs | -13.52% |
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices[(16384, 0.5)] |
137.3 µs | 156.3 µs | -12.2% |
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices[(16384, 0.9)] |
237.9 µs | 269.7 µs | -11.77% |
| ❌ | Simulation | set_indices[(16384, 0.99)] |
256 µs | 289.4 µs | -11.57% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] |
1 ms | 1.2 ms | -10.86% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.01, 1.0)] |
395.2 µs | 442.5 µs | -10.69% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/df-55 (ba2ac36) with develop (4b37237)
Footnotes
-
42 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩