feat[array]: lazy numeric #6469

Performance Regression: -20.9%

❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1132 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1268 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`take_200k_dispersed`	3.6 ms	4.5 ms	-19.6%
❌	Simulation	`take_200k_first_chunk_only`	3.3 ms	4.2 ms	-20.9%
❌	Simulation	`new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768]`	113.2 µs	125.8 µs	-10.04%

_{Comparing ji/lazy-numeric (84653c9) with develop (4d46f3c)}

1268 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩