Remove EncodeVTable

[gatesn]

Having an EncodeVTable implies the caller knows the target encoding.

Instead we want to have pluggable "compressors", where the output array could be anything.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 12.36%

_{Comparing ngates/remove-encode-vtable (1332f16) with develop (a375642)¹}

Summary

⚡ 24 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1228 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1254 skipped benchmarks²

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	bench_many_nulls[0.9]	462.2 µs	527.4 µs	-12.36%
❌	Simulation	bench_many_nulls[0.5]	323.4 µs	359.3 µs	-10.01%
⚡	Simulation	binary_search_vortex	875.6 ns	788.1 ns	+11.1%
⚡	Simulation	new_raw_prim_test_between[u32, 32768]	136.5 µs	106.7 µs	+27.95%
⚡	Simulation	new_raw_prim_test_between[u64, 16384]	104.3 µs	87.8 µs	+18.76%
⚡	Simulation	new_raw_prim_test_between[u64, 32768]	192.6 µs	159.5 µs	+20.75%
⚡	Simulation	new_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 16384]	106.5 µs	91.5 µs	+16.42%
⚡	Simulation	new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 32768]	260.9 µs	227.9 µs	+14.45%
⚡	Simulation	new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]	140.3 µs	123.8 µs	+13.34%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 16384]	87.4 µs	72.3 µs	+20.89%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i16, 32768]	147.9 µs	117.8 µs	+25.52%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]	104.8 µs	89.7 µs	+16.86%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]	137.9 µs	121.4 µs	+13.63%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]	247.9 µs	215 µs	+15.3%
⚡	Simulation	new_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]	181.9 µs	151.8 µs	+19.82%
⚡	Simulation	new_raw_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]	157.8 µs	111.6 µs	+41.41%
⚡	Simulation	new_raw_prim_test_between[f64, 2048]	28.5 µs	25.6 µs	+11.33%
⚡	Simulation	new_raw_prim_test_between[f32, 2048]	24.9 µs	22.3 µs	+11.63%
⚡	Simulation	new_raw_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]	115.7 µs	91.5 µs	+26.44%
⚡	Simulation	new_raw_prim_test_between[f32, 16384]	86.9 µs	63.9 µs	+35.96%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on develop (2162a15) during the generation of this report, so a375642 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 1254 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.72093% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.85%. Comparing base (b4204cb) to head (1332f16).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
encodings/zigzag/src/compute/mod.rs	80.55%	7 Missing ⚠️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.