Skip to content

Conversation

@gatesn
Copy link
Contributor

@gatesn gatesn commented Dec 2, 2025

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
@gatesn gatesn added the changelog/feature A new feature label Dec 2, 2025
@gatesn gatesn requested a review from connortsui20 December 2, 2025 18:18
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 2, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5610 will degrade performances by 15.84%

Comparing ngates/filter-array (e40d5e8) with develop (536bca9)

Summary

❌ 44 regressions
✅ 1114 untouched
⏩ 617 skipped1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 10, 10)] 106.8 µs 122.5 µs -12.77%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 10, 100)] 850.3 µs 980.9 µs -13.32%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 100, 10)] 108.8 µs 124.5 µs -12.62%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 100, 100)] 867.4 µs 999.4 µs -13.21%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 1000, 10)] 125 µs 140.9 µs -11.3%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 1000, 100)] 1 ms 1.2 ms -11.38%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 10, 10)] 109.5 µs 124.6 µs -12.14%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 10, 100)] 865.1 µs 990.4 µs -12.65%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 100, 10)] 108.3 µs 123.5 µs -12.3%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 100, 100)] 866.7 µs 994.2 µs -12.83%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 1000, 10)] 125.6 µs 141 µs -10.87%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 1000, 100)] 1 ms 1.2 ms -11.11%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 10, 10)] 109.6 µs 125.1 µs -12.4%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 10, 100)] 851.6 µs 983.8 µs -13.44%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 100, 10)] 108.6 µs 124.2 µs -12.54%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 100, 100)] 866.4 µs 997.8 µs -13.17%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 1000, 10)] 125.7 µs 141.6 µs -11.21%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 1000, 100)] 1 ms 1.2 ms -11.27%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[u32, (1000, 10, 10)] 106.4 µs 121.7 µs -12.58%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[u32, (1000, 10, 100)] 828.8 µs 958.4 µs -13.52%
... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

  1. 617 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 54 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.26%. Comparing base (536bca9) to head (e40d5e8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
vortex-array/src/arrays/filter/vtable.rs 0.00% 54 Missing ⚠️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gatesn gatesn enabled auto-merge (squash) December 2, 2025 18:29
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would prefer the vtables in different files but if were collapsing them all soon then its not that important

Copy link
Contributor

@connortsui20 connortsui20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lets go

@gatesn gatesn merged commit decb562 into develop Dec 2, 2025
49 of 50 checks passed
@gatesn gatesn deleted the ngates/filter-array branch December 2, 2025 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/feature A new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants