Remove unused scope

[gatesn]

We were just deref'ing it to an array before!

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5217 will degrade performances by 16.19%

_{Comparing ngates/remove-scope (dfb0210) with develop (28f5b3d)¹}

Summary

⚡ 43 improvements
❌ 59 regressions
✅ 1216 untouched
🆕 7 new
⏩ 155 skipped²

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.0, 0.25)]	12.1 µs	8.7 µs	+39.55%
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.0, 0.95)]	12.1 µs	8.7 µs	+39.08%
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.0, 1.0)]	11.5 µs	8.6 µs	+32.83%
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 0.25)]	26.4 µs	11.9 µs	×2.2
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 0.95)]	26 µs	11.6 µs	×2.3
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 1.0)]	15.1 µs	11.4 µs	+33.01%
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.1, 0.25)]	26.2 µs	11.7 µs	×2.2
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.1, 0.95)]	28.2 µs	13.3 µs	×2.1
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.1, 1.0)]	16.2 µs	12.5 µs	+28.99%
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.0, 0.25)]	81.2 µs	27.4 µs	×3
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.0, 0.95)]	81.1 µs	27.4 µs	×3
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.0, 1.0)]	81 µs	27.2 µs	×3
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.01, 0.25)]	97.2 µs	30.7 µs	×3.2
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.01, 0.95)]	98.6 µs	31.4 µs	×3.1
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.01, 1.0)]	85.7 µs	32.2 µs	×2.7
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.1, 0.25)]	102.3 µs	34.1 µs	×3
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.1, 0.95)]	119 µs	40.6 µs	×2.9
⚡	decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.1, 1.0)]	95.4 µs	40.8 µs	×2.3
⚡	decompress_alp[f64, (1000, 0.0, 0.25)]	16.8 µs	11.5 µs	+46.57%
⚡	decompress_alp[f64, (1000, 0.0, 0.95)]	16.7 µs	11.6 µs	+43.29%
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on develop (7dde2f4) during the generation of this report, so 28f5b3d was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 155 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 97.29730% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.86%. Comparing base (28f5b3d) to head (dfb0210).
⚠️ Report is 16 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
vortex-layout/src/layouts/row_idx/mod.rs	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.