-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
cherrypick 4829 to release 1.13: keep terminating pod in job #4860
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: release-1.13
Are you sure you want to change the base?
cherrypick 4829 to release 1.13: keep terminating pod in job #4860
Conversation
Signed-off-by: wangdongyang1 <wangdongyang1@sensetime.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @kingeasternsun, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request cherry-picks a critical fix to the 1.13 release branch, resolving an issue in the job controller where jobs could incorrectly mark themselves as 'Aborted' even when their associated pods were still in the process of terminating. The change ensures that terminating pods are kept within the job's internal cache until their complete deletion, thereby preventing premature job state transitions and enhancing the robustness of job management. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request is a cherry-pick that fixes a bug where jobs could transition to an Aborted state while some of their pods were still terminating. The issue stemmed from prematurely removing pods with a DeletionTimestamp from the job cache in the addPod and updatePod handlers.
The fix correctly removes this logic, ensuring that terminating pods remain in the cache until they are fully deleted, at which point a proper delete event is received. This allows the job state machine to have an accurate view of its pods and manage its lifecycle correctly.
The changes are accompanied by new test cases in TestAddPodFunc and TestUpdatePodFunc that specifically verify the corrected behavior for pods with a DeletionTimestamp.
The changes are logical, well-targeted, and the added tests provide good coverage for the fix. The pull request looks good to merge.
|
/lgtm |
|
/Re-run jobs |
What type of PR is this?
cherrypick #4829 to release 1.13:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fixes #4828
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #4828
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?