Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Frontend] add add_request_id middleware #9594

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cjackal
Copy link
Contributor

@cjackal cjackal commented Oct 22, 2024

FIX #9593


PR Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Model] for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.
  • [Frontend] For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server, LLM class, etc.)
  • [Kernel] for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.
  • [Core] for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g., LLMEngine, AsyncLLMEngine, Scheduler, etc.)
  • [Hardware][Vendor] for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g., [Hardware][AMD]).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • We adhere to Google Python style guide and Google C++ style guide.
  • Pass all linter checks. Please use format.sh to format your code.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.
  • Please add documentation to docs/source/ if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.

Adding or changing kernels

Each custom kernel needs a schema and one or more implementations to be registered with PyTorch.

  • Make sure custom ops are registered following PyTorch guidelines: Custom C++ and CUDA Operators and The Custom Operators Manual
  • Custom operations that return Tensors require meta-functions. Meta-functions should be implemented and registered in python so that dynamic dims can be handled automatically. See above documents for a description of meta-functions.
  • Use torch.libary.opcheck() to test the function registration and meta-function for any registered ops. See tests/kernels for examples.
  • When changing the C++ signature of an existing op, the schema must be updated to reflect the changes.
  • If a new custom type is needed, see the following document: Custom Class Support in PT2.

Notes for Large Changes

Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with rfc-required and might not go through the PR.

What to Expect for the Reviews

The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:

  • After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer. Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and availability.
  • After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.
  • After the review, the reviewer will put an action-required label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.
  • Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask for clarification or discuss the suggestion.

Thank You

Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@cjackal cjackal marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 19:01
@cjackal
Copy link
Contributor Author

cjackal commented Oct 22, 2024

It's a little vague where and how unit test should be written, suggestions are welcome.

request_id = request.headers.get("X-Request-Id", uuid.uuid4().hex)
response = await call_next(request)
response.headers["X-Request-Id"] = request_id
return response
Copy link
Contributor

@guoyuhong guoyuhong Oct 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This X-Request-id seems not connected to request_id in create_chat_completion.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, this id has nothing to do with chat request id(or request id of other OpenAI API response body). This behavior is consistent with OprnAI's current behavior, and you can recover this id like:

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(...)
response = client.chat.completions.create(...)
response._request_id

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then, LGTM.

Copy link
Collaborator

@simon-mo simon-mo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes sense to me given it's industry standard. It would be great to add comment about this as well. Thanks!

vllm/entrypoints/openai/api_server.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cjackal and others added 3 commits October 26, 2024 14:25
Signed-off-by: cjackal <44624812+cjackal@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Mo <simon.mo@hey.com>
Signed-off-by: cjackal <44624812+cjackal@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: cjackal <44624812+cjackal@users.noreply.github.com>
@cjackal
Copy link
Contributor Author

cjackal commented Oct 26, 2024

@simon-mo Just have added an example using custom headers in the openai-compatible-server page (and sign-off), tell me if there's better spot to add comment about it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature]: support x-request-id header
3 participants