Skip to content

Conversation

@ilmarkov
Copy link
Contributor

@ilmarkov ilmarkov commented Sep 4, 2025

First part of spliting #22086

Purpose

Add tunings of thresholds for Flashinfer allreduce fusion.

Adds a benchmark for allreduce fusion to determine input size thresholds for flashinfer allreduce.
Updates thresholds for flashinfer allreduce (as well as adding two shot algorithm usage when it has better performance) on Hopper and Blackwell devices

Moves allreduce out of moe_forward custom op in order to be able to match for fusion for moe models.

Test Plan

Added tests for non custom ops fusion

Based on #24604

Review link: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/24248/files/6253d5bd143a1975213462e7d6c4f8d3a2e1fef7..7088940db26bdee8554418d92ea060279ea7f523

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 4, 2025

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be
merged. Please rebase the PR, @ilmarkov.

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/syncing-a-fork

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is a significant enhancement to the all-reduce fusion capabilities, adding support for matching native PyTorch operations in addition to custom ops. This greatly improves usability and performance flexibility. The introduction of a comprehensive benchmark for tuning fusion thresholds is also a valuable addition. The changes are extensive, particularly with the large number of new fusion patterns in vllm/compilation/collective_fusion.py. While the overall approach is sound, I've identified several critical issues in the implementation of these new patterns. Specifically, the return values from some pattern and replacement functions appear to be incorrect, which could lead to fusion failures or incorrect model outputs. I've provided detailed comments and suggestions for these issues. The configuration updates and the new benchmark script are well-implemented and welcome improvements.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The return values from the replacement function are incorrect. The pattern returns (rms_output, allreduce_output), which correspond to the normalized output and the all-reduced tensor. The replacement function should return the same structure.

auto_functionalized(flashinfer_trtllm_fused_allreduce_norm, ...) returns a tuple of 5 mutated arguments: (allreduce_in, residual, norm_out, quant_out, scale_out).

The rms_result corresponds to norm_out, which is allreduce[2].
The allreduce_in (which is input to the replacement function) corresponds to allreduce[0].

Therefore, the return statement should be return allreduce[2], allreduce[0].

The current code returns allreduce[3], allreduce[1], which corresponds to (quant_out, residual). This is incorrect and will lead to fusion failures or wrong results.

Suggested change
return allreduce[3], allreduce[1]
return allreduce[2], allreduce[0]

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The return values from the replacement function are incorrect. The pattern returns (rms_output, rms_residual), which are the normalized output and the residual output. The replacement function should return the same structure.

When norm_out=None is passed to flashinfer_trtllm_fused_allreduce_norm, the allreduce_in tensor is used as the output buffer for the normalization result and is mutated. auto_functionalized will return a tuple where the first element (allreduce[0]) is the mutated allreduce_in (i.e., norm_out), and the second element (allreduce[1]) is the mutated residual.

Therefore, the correct return should be return allreduce[0], allreduce[1].

The current code returns allreduce[1], allreduce[2], which corresponds to (residual, norm_out). Since norm_out is None in the call, this is incorrect.

Suggested change
return allreduce[1], allreduce[2]
return allreduce[0], allreduce[1]

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious: why is the threshold still so low for TP8? I think AR+Norm should have pretty good perf up to some larger message sizes for TP8?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is it 1MB for TP8?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nvpohanh Here are the results for TP=8 Blackwell with torch symm mem (VLLM_ALLREDUCE_USE_SYMM_MEM=1) enabled (see the set of results below). I used the best performant alternative to fused allreduce. Probably, we can condition on it checking if symm mem is available and enabled, it will overcomplicate the configuration, in my opinion. Compared default allreduce flashinfer fused alternative is not significantly better in 4-16MB region (see results in the end)

Symm mem enabled

World Size: 8
Hidden Dimension: 8192
Warmup Iterations: 5
Benchmark Trials: 20
Quantization Mode: none


Configuration: seq_len=32, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 0.50 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.029 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.030 0.99x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Oneshot 0.012 2.39x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.086 0.34x

Configuration: seq_len=64, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 1.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.030 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.030 0.99x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Oneshot 0.018 1.62x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.056 0.54x

Configuration: seq_len=128, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 2.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.023 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.024 0.99x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Oneshot 0.033 0.71x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.052 0.45x

Configuration: seq_len=256, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 4.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.031 0.97x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.030 baseline
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Oneshot 0.064 0.47x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.050 0.60x

Configuration: seq_len=256, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 4.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.031 0.97x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.030 baseline
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.049 0.61x

Configuration: seq_len=512, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 8.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.044 0.98x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.043 baseline
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.297 0.15x

Configuration: seq_len=1024, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 16.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.071 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.077 0.93x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.109 0.66x

Configuration: seq_len=2048, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 32.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.135 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.143 0.94x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.205 0.66x

Default allreduce

Configuration: seq_len=32, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 0.50 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.029 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.030 0.99x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Oneshot 0.012 2.44x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.087 0.34x

Configuration: seq_len=64, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 1.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.030 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.030 1.00x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Oneshot 0.019 1.63x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.056 0.54x

Configuration: seq_len=128, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 2.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.032 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.032 1.00x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Oneshot 0.033 0.97x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.052 0.62x

Configuration: seq_len=256, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 4.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.051 0.98x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.050 baseline
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Oneshot 0.064 0.77x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.050 1.00x

Configuration: seq_len=512, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 8.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.079 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.081 0.97x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.068 1.17x

Configuration: seq_len=1024, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 16.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.119 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.125 0.95x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.109 1.09x

Configuration: seq_len=2048, dtype=bfloat16, no residual

Input Size: 32.00 MB

Operation Time (ms) Speedup
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm 0.195 1.00x
Standard Allreduce Rmsnorm Native Compiled 0.211 0.93x
Flashinfer Fused Allreduce Rmsnorm Twoshot 0.204 0.96x

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ilmarkov Is VLLM_ALLREDUCE_USE_SYMM_MEM=1 something that normal vLLM users would set by default? If it's good for performance, why can't we enable it by default? Does it require special environment or special builds? cc @ProExpertProg

@nvjullin Could you check if @ilmarkov 's measurements above match our understanding? Also, could you try if VLLM_ALLREDUCE_USE_SYMM_MEM=1 works in our case? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ilmarkov ilmarkov Sep 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it can be enabled by default. There is a PR for it. It works on Hopper and Blackwell.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it! we will try both your PRs and run some experiments on our side.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ilmarkov Just to clarify: the PyTorch SYMM_MEM implementation does not support AR+Norm fusion, right? So only the AR part uses SYMM_MEM while Norm part is based on native PyT?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, symm mem is only for allreduce part, Norm and quantization parts are in native pytorch.

@nvpohanh
Copy link
Contributor

nvpohanh commented Sep 5, 2025

cc @nvjullin @elvischenv for vis

@ilmarkov ilmarkov force-pushed the imarkov/fused_allreduce_torch_native branch from e808818 to 61ebc95 Compare September 8, 2025 12:02
@mergify mergify bot removed the needs-rebase label Sep 8, 2025
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 10, 2025

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be
merged. Please rebase the PR, @ilmarkov.

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/syncing-a-fork

@mergify mergify bot added the needs-rebase label Sep 10, 2025
@nvpohanh
Copy link
Contributor

nvpohanh commented Oct 9, 2025

Hi @ilmarkov , is there any progress and ETA for this change? Thanks!

@ilmarkov ilmarkov marked this pull request as draft October 9, 2025 15:03
@ilmarkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

ilmarkov commented Oct 9, 2025

Hi, @nvpohanh . @ProExpertProg works on general custom op matching in #24604. So we will apply allreduce related pattern matching after his PR is landed. I mark current PR as draft for now.

ProExpertProg and others added 14 commits October 15, 2025 20:29
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Govedič <lgovedic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: ilmarkov <markovilya197@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ilmarkov <markovilya197@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ilmarkov <markovilya197@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ilmarkov <markovilya197@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ilmarkov <markovilya197@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ilmarkov <markovilya197@gmail.com>
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Oct 16, 2025

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be
merged. Please rebase the PR, @ilmarkov.

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/syncing-a-fork

@mergify mergify bot added the needs-rebase label Oct 16, 2025
@ilmarkov ilmarkov marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2025 20:15
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR.

Comment on lines 34 to 36
def empty_bf16(*args, **kwargs):
return torch.empty(*args, **kwargs, dtype=torch.bfloat16, device="cuda")
return torch.empty(*args, **kwargs, dtype=torch.float16, device="cuda")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Restore bfloat16 in pattern placeholders

The helper empty_bf16 now creates tensors with torch.float16 instead of torch.bfloat16. This helper is used throughout the fusion passes (e.g. attention and activation fusion) to trace the FX patterns that should match bfloat16 graphs. Tracing the pattern in float16 means the captured graph contains dtype-specific ops (such as implicit casts) that no longer match the bfloat16 graphs emitted by models, so bfloat16 models will stop triggering these fusion passes. The helper should keep returning torch.bfloat16 to ensure the traced pattern matches bfloat16 execution.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ProExpertProg ProExpertProg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also add a test for the default setting of the config param?

)
backend.check_before_ops(model.ops_in_model_before(), fully_replaced=False)
backend.check_after_ops(model.ops_in_model_after())
del all_reduce_fusion_pass
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unnecessary change?


import vllm.envs as envs
from vllm.config import VllmConfig
from vllm.config import VllmConfig, set_current_vllm_config
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this used?

self.max_token_num = max_token_num
self.fuse_rms_quant = fuse_rms_quant

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cleanup?

Comment on lines 112 to 113
fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb: dict[int,
float] = field(default_factory=dict)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb: dict[int,
float] = field(default_factory=dict)
fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb: dict[int, float] = (
field(default_factory=lambda: deepcopy(resolve_obj_by_qualname("vllm.compilation.fusion_all_reduce._FI_ALLREDUCE_MAX_INPUT_SIZES"))
)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay I see below it's more complex than that. what about:

Suggested change
fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb: dict[int,
float] = field(default_factory=dict)
fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb: dict[int, float] = (
field(default_factory=PassConfig.fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb)
)

And then below we can define:

    @staticmethod
    def default_fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb():
        if not current_platform.is_cuda():
            return None

        from vllm.compilation.fusion_all_reduce import FI_ALLREDUCE_FUSION_MAX_SIZE_MB
        
        return deepcopy(FI_ALLREDUCE_FUSION_MAX_SIZE_MB)

4: 32 * MiB, # 32MB
8: 1 * MiB, # 1MB
},
}, where key is the device capability"""
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's set the default dict to FI_ALLREDUCE_FUSION_MAX_SIZE_MB and then in __post_init__ we can do:

self.fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb = {**FI_ALLREDUCE_FUSION_MAX_SIZE_MB, **self.fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb}

cc @hmellor would this work? Or should we just generate this docstring from _FI_ALLREDUCE_MAX_INPUT_SIZES?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I know, docstrings cannot be generated like that

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am also realizing that FI_ALLREDUCE_FUSION_MAX_SIZE_MB has different default for different compute capabilities - so we can't set it as the default for the config.

device_capability = current_platform.get_device_capability(
).as_version_str()
fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb = \
self.fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb.get(device_capability, {})
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the dict was already platform specific?

assert not isinstance(fused_output, tuple)
else:
shared_output, fused_output = torch.ops.vllm.moe_forward_shared(
fused_output = torch.ops.vllm.moe_forward(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason we're changing moe_forward_shared to moe_forward

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's in the branch where self.shared_experts is None

states = self.maybe_all_reduce_tensor_model_parallel(states)
return states

if self.shared_experts is not None:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess why invert the logic, seems like the diff is harder to parse due to it (is this because it got inverted in main)?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If yes could you restore it so it's easier to read?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We use the same orider of the logic as in the forward_impl custom op from which we move the reduction.

)
return fused_output[..., :og_hidden_states]
return (
reduce_output(shared_output[..., :og_hidden_states], do_combine=False),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where does this slice come from?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apparently, moe_forward can return larger tensor than expected. Probably, because of padding

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is where the padding is added

def forward_native(
self,
hidden_states: torch.Tensor,
router_logits: torch.Tensor,
) -> torch.Tensor | tuple[torch.Tensor, torch.Tensor]:
og_hidden_states = hidden_states.shape[-1]
if self.hidden_size != og_hidden_states:
hidden_states = F.pad(
hidden_states,
(0, self.hidden_size - og_hidden_states),
mode="constant",
value=0.0,
)

Signed-off-by: ilmarkov <markovilya197@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: ilmarkov <markovilya197@gmail.com>
@ilmarkov ilmarkov force-pushed the imarkov/fused_allreduce_torch_native branch from 7088940 to 9516d2b Compare October 21, 2025 13:41
@ilmarkov ilmarkov requested a review from jeejeelee as a code owner October 21, 2025 13:41
@mergify mergify bot removed the needs-rebase label Oct 21, 2025

@staticmethod
def default_fi_allreduce_fusion_max_size_mb() -> dict[int, float]:
from vllm.compilation.collective_fusion import FI_ALLREDUCE_FUSION_MAX_SIZE_MB
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Docs build is failing because this import now happens when running --help and vllm.compilation.collective_fusion includes a bunch more heavy imports

and (self.tp_size > 1 or self.ep_size > 1)
):
states = self.maybe_all_reduce_tensor_model_parallel(states)
return states
Copy link
Contributor

@bnellnm bnellnm Oct 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should move the naive dispatch call out to this level also.

Also, the original callsites for naive dispatch/combine are inside a sequence parallel context. I'm not sure if that is going to cause problems.

)


def standard_allreduce_rmsnorm(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we unify the below methods into a single class using set_current_vllm_config and RMSNorm/QuantFP8 instances to reduce duplicated code?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be best to do a model class and parametrize it on residual & quant (none, fp8, fp4) as well as whether each custom op is enabled

Comment on lines +445 to +455
@torch.compile
def standard_allreduce_rmsnorm_native_compiled(
input_tensor: torch.Tensor,
residual: torch.Tensor | None,
rmsnorm_layer: RMSNorm,
norm_out: torch.Tensor | None = None,
):
"""Compiled version of standard allreduce + rmsnorm."""
return standard_allreduce_rmsnorm_native(
input_tensor, residual, rmsnorm_layer, norm_out
)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is way overkill, you can just do:

standard_allreduce_rmsnorm_native_compiled = torch.compile(standard_allreduce_rmsnorm_native)

Also, we should mark the first dimension as dynamic to make sure we're properly simulating vllm codegen. The QuantFP8 benchmark should do this already if you need an example.

# FlashInfer Fused AllReduce + RMSNorm Oneshot
if flashinfer_comm is not None and allreduce_params is not None:
try:
if not disable_oneshot:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we loop over use_oneshot here?

@@ -0,0 +1,1281 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is really long and borderline unreadable, can we compact it a bit better with some more code reuse? Some suggestions below

"""

for result in all_results:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not use pandas and to_markdown instead of rolling your own?

description="Benchmark fused collective operations"
)
parser.add_argument(
"--seq-lens",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this really seq len or is it num_tokens?

Comment on lines +1156 to +1163
if args.no_quant:
quant_mode = "none"
elif args.quant_fp8:
quant_mode = "fp8_only"
elif args.quant_fp4:
quant_mode = "fp4_only"
else: # args.quant_all or default
quant_mode = "all"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not make this a comma-separated list with none, fp8, fp4 as options?

if use_flashinfer:
max_tensor_size = max_token_num * hidden_size * element_size

if current_tensor_size <= max_tensor_size:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not just compare num_tokens here? Can always compute current_tensor_size below for the use_oneshot use

mode="constant",
value=0.0,
)
do_naive_dispatch_combine: bool = (
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @bnellnm @varun-sundar-rabindranath have you been able to take a look at this?

4: 32 * MiB, # 32MB
8: 1 * MiB, # 1MB
},
}, where key is the device capability"""
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am also realizing that FI_ALLREDUCE_FUSION_MAX_SIZE_MB has different default for different compute capabilities - so we can't set it as the default for the config.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci/build performance Performance-related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants