Skip to content

[Bugfix] Fix broken v0 multimodal inference #19814

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Isotr0py
Copy link
Collaborator

@Isotr0py Isotr0py commented Jun 18, 2025

Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist

  • The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.

Purpose

RuntimeError: torch.cat(): expected a non-empty list of Tensors

Test Plan

Test Result

(Optional) Documentation Update

Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
@Isotr0py Isotr0py requested a review from hmellor as a code owner June 18, 2025 16:46
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@mergify mergify bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation llama Related to Llama models qwen Related to Qwen models labels Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Isotr0py, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request provides a critical bug fix for the v0 multimodal inference pipeline, specifically addressing an issue where text-only inputs would cause a runtime error due to incorrect handling of multimodal embeddings. The core change refines conditional logic across various model implementations to ensure robust behavior when multimodal data is not present, thereby improving the stability and correctness of multimodal inference.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Multimodal Inference: This pull request resolves a RuntimeError: torch.cat(): expected a non-empty list of Tensors that occurred in v0 multimodal inference when processing text-only inputs. The issue stemmed from an incorrect conditional check that attempted to merge non-existent multimodal embeddings.
  • Conditional Logic Refinement: The fix involves changing the conditional check from multimodal_embeddings is not None to multimodal_embeddings (a boolean evaluation) across numerous multimodal model implementations. This ensures that the embedding merging logic is correctly skipped when multimodal_embeddings is an empty tensor or similar falsy value, which is the expected behavior for text-only inputs.
  • Test Stability: The changes also address a failing sampler test on the main branch, contributing to overall system stability.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a bug in multimodal inference where an empty list of embeddings, when not None, would still proceed to the merging step, causing errors. The fix involves changing the condition from multimodal_embeddings is not None to the more Pythonic if multimodal_embeddings:. This correctly handles cases where multimodal_embeddings is None or an empty list/tuple, preventing downstream errors like IndexError or torch.cat() issues.

The change is consistently applied across numerous model files and the documentation, which is appropriate for a fix to a common utility pattern. The solution is clear, concise, and directly addresses the described problem. This is a good improvement for robustness and correctness.

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Further update the model as follows:
# model as one of the requirements of basic vLLM model implementation.
inputs_embeds = self.language_model.get_input_embeddings(input_ids)

if multimodal_embeddings is not None:
if multimodal_embeddings:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The change from multimodal_embeddings is not None to if multimodal_embeddings: in this documentation example correctly reflects the corresponding code changes. This updated condition is more Pythonic and robustly handles cases where multimodal_embeddings might be an empty list or tuple (which evaluates to False), in addition to None.

@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ def get_input_embeddings(
multimodal_embeddings: Optional[MultiModalEmbeddings] = None,
) -> torch.Tensor:
inputs_embeds = self.language_model.get_input_embeddings(input_ids)
if multimodal_embeddings is not None:
if multimodal_embeddings:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This change from if multimodal_embeddings is not None: to if multimodal_embeddings: is a good fix.

As per the PR description, the previous condition (is not None) would evaluate to True if multimodal_embeddings was an empty list (e.g., []). This would lead to merge_multimodal_embeddings being called with an empty list for multimodal_embeddings.

If multimodal_embeddings is an empty list but input_ids still contains placeholder tokens, this could lead to an IndexError within merge_multimodal_embeddings when trying to access multimodal_embeddings[0]. The torch.cat() error mentioned in the PR description might be another symptom depending on the exact path taken within merge_multimodal_embeddings.

The new condition if multimodal_embeddings: correctly evaluates to False for both None and empty lists/tuples, thus preventing merge_multimodal_embeddings from being called inappropriately. This makes the code more robust and Pythonic.

@Isotr0py
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oh, didn't notice #19715

@Isotr0py Isotr0py closed this Jun 18, 2025
@Isotr0py Isotr0py deleted the fix-mm-v0 branch June 18, 2025 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation llama Related to Llama models qwen Related to Qwen models
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant