-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
[Fix] Fix typo in resolve_hf_chat_template
#18259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Felix Marty <felmarty@amd.com>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
#18259 (comment) also results in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for identifying, this bug was introduced in #18098
@mgoin Thanks! I'll try to submit a fix in lm-eval-harness for the missing I also noticed that sglang in lm-eval-harness does not use this Compare: |
Yes @fxmarty-amd this is intentional for the vllm backend. @anmarques introduced the |
Signed-off-by: Felix Marty <felmarty@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Yuqi Zhang <yuqizhang@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Marty <felmarty@amd.com> Signed-off-by: minpeter <kali2005611@gmail.com>
This makes
lm_eval --model vllm
fail.