Skip to content

[Bugfix] add Qwen3ReasoningParser #17377

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chaunceyjiang
Copy link
Contributor

@chaunceyjiang chaunceyjiang commented Apr 29, 2025

The main difference lies here.

else:
# no </think> in previous or delta, reasoning content continues
return DeltaMessage(reasoning_content=delta_text)

FIX #17349

Signed-off-by: chaunceyjiang <chaunceyjiang@gmail.com>
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@chaunceyjiang chaunceyjiang changed the title [Bugfix] add Qwen3ReasoningParser' [Bugfix] add Qwen3ReasoningParser Apr 29, 2025
@chaunceyjiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

chaunceyjiang commented Apr 29, 2025

Noticed that another contributor mentioned the PR #17369 before I did, so I'm closing mine.

@chaunceyjiang chaunceyjiang deleted the qwen3 branch April 30, 2025 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Qwen3's answer was wrongly placed in reasoning_content
1 participant