-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 434
[Docs]refactor: change architecture to stand-alone directories #1236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @yyzxw, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on improving the organization and navigability of the project's documentation. The primary change involves restructuring the documentation's table of contents to give architectural information its own top-level section, enhancing clarity and user experience. Additionally, a minor configuration adjustment has been made to improve the default display of the documentation sidebar.
Highlights
- Documentation Structure Refactoring: I've refactored the documentation structure by moving the
architecture.rst
document from under the 'Getting Started' section to its own dedicated 'Architecture' section in the table of contents. This provides a clearer separation and easier navigation for architectural documentation. - Documentation Navigation Enhancement: I've updated the Sphinx configuration to automatically expand the first two levels of the navigation sidebar. This should improve discoverability of documentation sections without requiring users to manually expand them.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the documentation by moving the architecture page into its own top-level section in the navigation. This improves the structure and discoverability of this important document. The accompanying change to conf.py
to increase the navigation depth shown in the sidebar is a good enhancement for the overall user experience of the documentation site. The changes are correct and well-implemented.
This is a good start of #1231, beside the overall architecture, we plan to add more docs explaining the architecture. If you have some bandwidth, feel free to make more PRs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks! lgtm
4912736
to
918f8fc
Compare
Signed-off-by: zxw <1020938856@qq.com>
@Jeffwan sure, I am happy to contribute to Aibrix 👏 |
…project#1236) refactor: change architecture to stand-alone directories Signed-off-by: zxw <1020938856@qq.com>
Pull Request Description
[Please provide a clear and concise description of your changes here]
Related Issues
Resolves: part of #1231
Important: Before submitting, please complete the description above and review the checklist below.
Contribution Guidelines (Expand for Details)
We appreciate your contribution to aibrix! To ensure a smooth review process and maintain high code quality, please adhere to the following guidelines:
Pull Request Title Format
Your PR title should start with one of these prefixes to indicate the nature of the change:
[Bug]
: Corrections to existing functionality[CI]
: Changes to build process or CI pipeline[Docs]
: Updates or additions to documentation[API]
: Modifications to aibrix's API or interface[CLI]
: Changes or additions to the Command Line Interface[Misc]
: For changes not covered above (use sparingly)Note: For changes spanning multiple categories, use multiple prefixes in order of importance.
Submission Checklist
By submitting this PR, you confirm that you've read these guidelines and your changes align with the project's contribution standards.