Update README and new license #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This should finally be merged (or at least closed). I think C.C NC-SA 4.0 is not the right choice since it forbids commercial use, which is bad for e.g. videos where you use V (and then maybe the logo in the thumbnail) or similar scenarios. |
Which one should be used then? |
|
I'm not very familiar with the CC licenses, but I think C.C by 3.0 (as you suggested) is good. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have changed the license from MIT to C.C. but I still want your guys opinion if we should use C.C by 3.0 or C.C NC-SA 4.0. What you guys think about this?