Skip to content

RSDK 691 concise way to call remote components #210

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

purplenicole730
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@purplenicole730 purplenicole730 marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2023 22:00
@purplenicole730 purplenicole730 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 8, 2023 22:00
Copy link
Member

@cheukt cheukt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good, would like to see another test or two

Copy link
Member

@njooma njooma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good overall! A few changes:

  1. There's a type mismatch for the _short_to_long_name dictionary
  2. I think storing the ResourceNames as an array inside of _short_to_long_name is not necessary and we can probably streamline it by deleting the entry on collision

Copy link
Member

@cheukt cheukt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@njooma njooma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Getting close! Some small changes

@purplenicole730 purplenicole730 merged commit 0d7eed7 into viamrobotics:main Feb 17, 2023
@purplenicole730 purplenicole730 deleted the RSDK-691-concise-way-to-call-remote-components branch February 17, 2023 17:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants