feat (ai/core): add experimental generateImage function #4056
Conversation
| import { GeneratedImage, GenerateImageResult } from './generate-image-result'; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| Embed a value using an embedding model. The type of the value is defined by the embedding model. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
has old content, need to update
| `generateImage` accepts an optional `headers` parameter of type `Record<string, string>` | ||
| that you can use to add custom headers to the image generation request. | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts highlight={"7"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks like it might be intended to highlight 8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
7 should be correct (headers) but i'll double check when deployed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes 7 shows as expected
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| name: 'headers', | ||
| type: 'Record<string, string>', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR-wide: should this be the set of types Resolvable allows? If so, update docs/code in some manner.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch, when we introduce resolvable more broadly we need to update this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wondered while reading:
- what format(s) are produced
- how does token usage work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- no token usage
- format is currently open, we can just add on-the-fly mimetype detection if people ask
| headers?: Record<string, string | undefined>; | ||
| }): PromiseLike<{ | ||
| /** | ||
| Generated images as base64 encoded strings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't we want some representation of what the binary format is, or to mention briefly in a doc comment if there is only one currently and no field specifier is needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if you mean the image type, we can auto-detect this later using magic bytes if needed
Fixes #2524
Tasks