Don't recurse into submodules

[devnev]

Description

Submodules can cause load errors and are skipped by a regular go list ./...

• Fixes error when loading package, can only [...] in module-aware mode #706

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

Version of Golang used when building/testing:

• 1.11
• 1.12
• 1.13
• 1.14
• 1.15
• 1.16
• 1.17
• 1.18
• 1.19
• 1.20
• 1.21

How Has This Been Tested?

go test github.com/vektra/mockery/v2/pkg/config

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

[LandonTClipp]

Thank you for the PR, this looks great. I'll review in the coming days.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 16 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (deb4860) 75.25042% compared to head (fc10b9c) 75.12500%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/config/config.go	48.38710%	13 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##              master        #731         +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage   75.25042%   75.12500%   -0.12543%     
===================================================
  Files              9           9                 
  Lines           2396        2400          +4     
===================================================
  Hits            1803        1803                 
- Misses           455         458          +3     
- Partials         138         139          +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[LandonTClipp]

The coverage tests are failing but I don't think that's relevant to this PR since you've clearly tested the changes. I don't have any concerns, we can go ahead and merge this. Thanks again for the contribution.

In the future, thinking about your original issue, we might want to also exclude paths with .mockery.yaml, but hopefully this will get you enough lift.

[LandonTClipp]

@devnev I had to revert this unfortunately as a regression was found (see linked reversion PR for details).

I'm quite astonished this slipped through as the tests we have are quite robust. Let me know if you're able to look into the reproducer. I'll look as well when I get some free time. Really need to find why the tests didn't catch this.