-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): Update lading to 0.20.0 #19259
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <jesse.szwedko@datadoghq.com>
Your preview site for the vector.dev will be ready in a few minutes, please allow time for it to build. Heres your preview link: |
Your preview site for the VRL Playground will be ready in a few minutes, please allow time for it to build. Heres your preview link: |
Your preview site for the Rust Doc will be ready in a few minutes, please allow time for it to build. Heres your preview link: |
/ci-run-regression (not sure if it will run otherwise) |
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ |
Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: 672ad5b1-08cf-4baf-a739-7d137dd3d3d9 ExplanationA regression test is an integrated performance test for Because a target's optimization goal performance in each experiment will vary somewhat each time it is run, we can only estimate mean differences in optimization goal relative to the baseline target. We express these differences as a percentage change relative to the baseline target, denoted "Δ mean %". These estimates are made to a precision that balances accuracy and cost control. We represent this precision as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI": there is a 90.00% chance that the true value of "Δ mean %" is in that interval. We decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if both of the following two criteria are true:
The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a statistically significant change in mean optimization goal performance between baseline and comparison SHAs with 90.00% confidence OR have been detected as newly erratic. Negative values of "Δ mean %" mean that baseline is faster, whereas positive values of "Δ mean %" mean that comparison is faster. Results that do not exhibit more than a ±5.00% change in their mean optimization goal are discarded. An experiment is erratic if its coefficient of variation is greater than 0.1. The abbreviated table will be omitted if no interesting change is observed. No interesting changes in experiment optimization goals with confidence ≥ 90.00% and |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%. Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
Turns out you were right! We can refer to the changelog in the future. |
This reverts commit 92d4102. Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <jesse.szwedko@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <jesse.szwedko@datadoghq.com>
This reverts commit ce615d0.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko jesse.szwedko@datadoghq.com