Skip to content

eip-2537#1583

Open
otherview wants to merge 6 commits intoevm-upgradesfrom
pedro/evm-2537
Open

eip-2537#1583
otherview wants to merge 6 commits intoevm-upgradesfrom
pedro/evm-2537

Conversation

@otherview
Copy link
Member

Description

  • Adds EIP-2537 BLS signatures
  • Target latest fork as Pectra ( instead of dencun )

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • New and existing E2E tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have not added any vulnerable dependencies to my code

@otherview otherview requested a review from a team as a code owner March 10, 2026 16:25
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 88.83495% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
vm/contracts.go 89.79% 11 Missing and 9 partials ⚠️
vm/evm.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
vm/interpreter.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Base automatically changed from paolo/evm-5656 to evm-upgrades March 11, 2026 09:43
Comment on lines +62 to 63
case evm.ChainConfig().IsPectra(evm.BlockNumber):
cfg.JumpTable = dencunInstructionSet
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't get this: shouldn't we have two separate IsPectra and IsDencun? I thought we wanted to keep the original naming from the three eth hf.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From my understanding (in thor's fork of shanghai) we merge all forks into the lastest one.
I beleive that happens because we have multiple forks activating in 1 block.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, I misunderstood it. So should it be Fusaka since it's the latest one we are including?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants