The FLORAL
package is an open-source computational tool to perform
log-ratio lasso regression modeling and compositional feature selection
for continuous, binary, time-to-event, and competing risk outcomes. The
proposed method adapts the augmented Lagrangian algorithm for a zero-sum
constraint optimization problem while enabling a two-stage screening
process for extended false-positive control.
The associated article for FLORAL
is available on
Cell Reports Methods.
The current version of FLORAL
(0.3.0) was built in R version 4.3.3. R
package dependencies can be found in the DESCRIPTION
file.
You can install FLORAL
with the following code. The installation is
typically complete within minutes.
install.packages("FLORAL")
You can install the development version of FLORAL
from
GitHub with:
# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("vdblab/FLORAL")
Here is a toy example for linear regression with 10-fold
cross-validation for a simulated data with 50 samples and 100
compositional features. Option progress=TRUE
can be used to show the
progress bar of the running algorithm.
The data simulation procedure is described in the preprint. The expected run time for the following demo is about a minute.
set.seed(23420)
library(FLORAL)
dat <- simu(n=50,p=100,model="linear")
fit <- FLORAL(dat$xcount,dat$y,family="gaussian",ncv=10,progress=FALSE)
To view plots of cross-validated prediction error and parameter
coefficients, use fit$pmse
or fit$pcoef
:
To view selected compositional features, use fit$selected.feature
,
where features are sorted by their names. Features under min
and 1se
correspond to penalty parameter min.2stage
and
1se.2stage
are obtained after applying 2-stage filtering based on
features under min
and 1se
, respectively.
We recommend interpreting the selected compositional features as potential predictive markers to the outcome in the regression model in the sense that the cross-validated prediction error is improved by considering these selected features.
fit$selected.feature
#> $min
#> [1] "taxa1" "taxa10" "taxa13" "taxa2" "taxa20" "taxa3" "taxa32" "taxa39"
#> [9] "taxa5" "taxa6" "taxa60" "taxa7" "taxa75" "taxa76" "taxa79" "taxa8"
#> [17] "taxa84" "taxa9" "taxa92"
#>
#> $`1se`
#> [1] "taxa1" "taxa10" "taxa13" "taxa2" "taxa20" "taxa3" "taxa32" "taxa39"
#> [9] "taxa5" "taxa6" "taxa7" "taxa75" "taxa8" "taxa84" "taxa9"
#>
#> $min.2stage
#> [1] "taxa1" "taxa10" "taxa13" "taxa2" "taxa20" "taxa3" "taxa32" "taxa5"
#> [9] "taxa6" "taxa60" "taxa7" "taxa79" "taxa8" "taxa84" "taxa9" "taxa92"
#>
#> $`1se.2stage`
#> [1] "taxa1" "taxa10" "taxa13" "taxa2" "taxa20" "taxa3" "taxa32" "taxa5"
#> [9] "taxa6" "taxa7" "taxa8" "taxa84" "taxa9"
To get specific log-ratios selected by the 2-stage procedure, use
fit$step2.log-ratios
, where min
and 1se
display the log-ratios
between features. For each identified ratio, min.idx
and 1se.idx
return the column indices in the original input matrix for the two
corresponding features forming the ratio.
fit$step2.ratios
#> $min
#> [1] "taxa1/taxa13" "taxa1/taxa20" "taxa1/taxa84" "taxa2/taxa5" "taxa3/taxa8"
#> [6] "taxa3/taxa92" "taxa5/taxa8" "taxa6/taxa9" "taxa7/taxa10" "taxa7/taxa79"
#> [11] "taxa8/taxa60" "taxa9/taxa32" "taxa9/taxa92"
#>
#> $`1se`
#> [1] "taxa1/taxa13" "taxa1/taxa20" "taxa1/taxa84" "taxa2/taxa5" "taxa3/taxa8"
#> [6] "taxa5/taxa8" "taxa6/taxa7" "taxa6/taxa9" "taxa7/taxa10" "taxa9/taxa32"
#>
#> $min.idx
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11] [,12] [,13] [,14]
#> [1,] NA 1 1 1 2 3 3 5 6 7 7 8 9 9
#> [2,] NA 13 20 84 5 8 92 8 9 10 79 60 32 92
#>
#> $`1se.idx`
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11]
#> [1,] NA 1 1 1 2 3 5 6 6 7 9
#> [2,] NA 13 20 84 5 8 8 7 9 10 32
More detailed interpretations can be obtained for the selected
log-ratios. First, the selected log-ratios also improve the
cross-validated prediction errors because these log-ratios are derived
from the constrained lasso estimate. Moreover, as guided by the
association table between log-ratios and the outcome, it is possible to
interpret the directions of the covariate effects associated with
certain log-ratios on the outcome. To view detailed associations between
selected log-ratios and the outcome, use fit$step2.tables
to print
summary tables for the multivariable stepwise regression models obtained
by the 2-stage procedure.
fit$step2.tables$min
fit$step2.tables$`1se`
For binary and survival outcomes, please specify family="binomial"
,
family="cox"
, or family="finegray"
accordingly.
dat.bin <- simu(n=50,p=100,model="binomial")
fit.bin <- FLORAL(dat.bin$xcount,dat.bin$y,family="binomial",ncv=10,progress=FALSE)
dat.cox <- simu(n=50,p=100,model="cox")
fit.cox <- FLORAL(dat.cox$xcount,survival::Surv(dat.cox$t,dat.cox$d),family="cox",ncv=10,progress=FALSE)
dat.fg <- simu(n=50,p=100,model="finegray")
fit.fg <- FLORAL(dat.cox$xcount,survival::Surv(dat.cox$t,dat.cox$d,type="mstate"),family="finegray",ncv=10,progress=FALSE,step2=FALSE)
Reproducible code for the analyses results reported in the manuscript can be found at this repository.
The FLORAL
package is jointly managed by MSKCC Biostatistics
service
and the Marcel van den Brink Lab. Please
note that the FLORAL
project is released with a Contributor Code of
Conduct.
By contributing to this project, you agree to abide by its terms. Thank
you to all contributors!
Fei T, Funnell T, Waters NR, Raj SS, Sadeghi K, Dai A, Miltiadous O, Shouval R, Lv M, Peled JU, Ponce DM, Perales M-A, Gönen M, van den Brink MRM, Scalable log-ratio lasso regression for enhanced microbial feature selection with FLORAL, Cell Reports Methods (2024), 100899; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100899.