feat(rest-api): add disable/enable action endpoints for hosts

[mpiton]

Description

Add REST API endpoints to disable and enable hosts, aligned with XAPI native vocabulary (host.disable / host.enable).

• POST /hosts/{id}/actions/disable — disables the host and, by default, evacuates all running VMs to other hosts in the pool.
  • evacuate (boolean, default false): set to true to evacuate VMs.
  • force (boolean): ignore evacuation errors.
  • vmIdsToForceMigrate (string[]): unblock VMs whose migration is blocked by pool_migrate or migrate_send operations.
  • Note: force and vmIdsToForceMigrate are only used when evacuating.
• POST /hosts/{id}/actions/enable — re-enables the host.

Both endpoints support async (202 + task) and sync (?sync=true, 204) modes via createAction, following the established action pattern (VM start/pause, Pool rolling_reboot, etc.).

Also adds missing clearHost, enableHost, and getRecordByUuid method signatures to the Xapi interface in @vates/types.

See XO-1800

Checklist

• Commit
  • Title follows commit conventions
  • Reference the relevant issue (See XO-1800)
• Changelog
  • If visible by XOA users, add changelog entry
  • Update "Packages to release" in CHANGELOG.unreleased.md
• PR
  • No UI changes
  • If not finished or not tested, open as Draft

Review process

If you are an external contributor, you can skip this part. Simply create the pull request, and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

This 2-passes review process aims to:

• develop skills of junior reviewers
• limit the workload for senior reviewers
• limit the number of unnecessary changes by the author

1. The author creates a PR.
2. Review process:
   1. The author assigns the junior reviewer.
   2. The junior reviewer conducts their review:
      • Resolves their comments if they are addressed.
      • Adds comments if necessary or approves the PR.
   3. The junior reviewer assigns the senior reviewer.
   4. The senior reviewer conducts their review:
      • If there are no unresolved comments on the PR → merge.
      • Otherwise, we continue with 3.
3. The author responds to comments and/or makes corrections, and we go back to 2.

Notes:

1. The author can request a review at any time, even if the PR is still a Draft.
2. In theory, there should not be more than one reviewer at a time.
3. The author should not make any changes:
   • When a reviewer is assigned.
   • Between the junior and senior reviews.

[plane-sync-vates]

Linked to Plane Work Item(s)

• [XO-1800] [REST API] enable/disable maintenance mode

This comment was auto-generated by Plane