Use realistic file paths in file scopes

[mattcompiles]

This PR is the start of getting rid of package names in file scopes, with the intention of using more realistic file paths for the app being compiled. This hopefully solves (or helps to solve) a bunch of issues with file resolution and file chunk naming.

Fixes #462
Fixes #631

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 340dc28

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages

Name	Type
@vanilla-extract/esbuild-plugin	Patch
@vanilla-extract/webpack-plugin	Patch
@vanilla-extract/vite-plugin	Patch
@vanilla-extract/integration	Major
@vanilla-extract/babel-plugin	Patch
@vanilla-extract/rollup-plugin	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[graup]

Looks good to me and does solve the file path problem. We should verify that this doesn't regress the fix for #427.

[mattcompiles]

@graup Thanks for reminding me about #427. I think it's possible this change could affect it. Thinking we should potentially make the filenames look absolute by prefixing with a /. That should hopefully stop any kind of automatic path processing from occurring as mentioned in the original issue. Will update this soon.

[mattcompiles]

@graup Looking to merge this soon. Happy with how it changes the rollup output? Seems cleaner to me but does make the custom asset file name test/docs a bit strange.

[graup]

@graup Looking to merge this soon. Happy with how it changes the rollup output? Seems cleaner to me but does make the custom asset file name test/docs a bit strange.

It does but I'm fine with that. That's optional anyway, no big deal if users don't get that. It works fine with the default setting too. To clarify, I wrote the rollup plugin and docs with this PR in mind.

[michaeltaranto]

LGTM