Update archive-delete-models.qmd

[mehdi0501]

adding a note that only admin users can see archived models

Internal Notes for Reviewers

External Release Notes

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[github-actions]

PR Summary

This pull request enhances the model archival and deletion process in the model inventory guide. The changes include:

• Clarification that once a model is archived, it can either be deleted or reactivated.
• Introduction of a note specifying that, by default, only Admin users have the permission to view and delete archived models. This is a configurable user permission setting.

These changes aim to improve the clarity and functionality of the model management process within the system.

Test Suggestions

• Verify that the documentation correctly reflects the ability to delete or reactivate a model after it has been archived.
• Check that the note about admin permissions is accurately displayed and understandable.
• Ensure that the user permission configuration for viewing and deleting archived models is functioning as described.

[github-actions]

A PR preview is available: Preview URL

[validbeck]

@mehdi0501 The condition for only admins being able to see archived model is already at the top of this page: LIVE LINK

This has a footnote that links to the permissions page that talks about being able to adjust for roles.

Re:

Once a model has been archived, you can then proceed with deleting the model or making it active again

I had a talk with @nrichers once about "simplicity" — for example, not calling out the cancel action for instructions unless they are a totally complete step (in this case, the "make it active again").

How about this? I made a parallel PR so not to override your changes without permission to give the copy in that section some clarity: #538

That PR pulls in your suggestions from this one so it's also authored by both of us. :)