Got rid of site unused

[validbeck]

Internal Notes for Reviewers

For sc-5565, I got rid of our site-unused folder.

Things moved

WIP

File tree	Description
	Anything I didn't delete ended up in site/wip (search set to false). These were either upcoming product docs that had a nice skeleton or some conceptual docs we might want to revisit.

@nrichers Let me know if you'd prefer to unthink-therefore-unam these bad boys and we can do that:

conceptual	product
mermaid-diagrams-dev-framework.qmd	editions-and-features.qmd (Refer to Slack conversation here.)
mrm-lifecycle.qmd
mrm-three-lines-of-defense.qmd
mrm.qmd

• It feels like the MRM ones are a bit covered in the glossary, but we should still think about expanding these "beginner" guides to make good on our claim of wanting to be an MRM authority, IMO.
• Mermaid diagram one might be good to be moved into templates, just so we know how to structure diagrams in the future.

/internal

New top-level (above site) folder for templates and testing (samples and examples moved from site/internal when done)

Slight edits

• Updated the /faq/faq-privacy.qmd page as there was one line from the duplicate file not present on this surfaced file
• There was a hidden merge conflict in a comment on release-notes.qmd for 2024-may-22 so I resolved that
• I previewed the editions-and-features.qmd file and found that the .column-screen-inset-right didn't actually look too great so I removed it
• Updated the instructions on where to move stuff after you're done fiddling on /internal/testing.qmd (the internal folder OUTSIDE of site instead of into the now non-existing site-unused)

Comparisons

	Old	New
File tree
README		*

*Just my VSCode preview theming, not to worry about the red.

[noosheenv]

I think this looks good, but we should wait for Nik to look just in case!

[nrichers]

Can we agree that nothing should live in site/ that isn't part of the public site?

For this PR, I think this means moving /site/wip up a level or deleting. I know search is set to false for these files, but there's no reason to build and externalize them at all, as they are just old cruft.

(I'd be fine with going one step further and just deleting that wip folder. All of the content in there is experimental from last year and largely defunct in its current form.)

[validbeck]

For this PR, I think this means moving /site/wip up a level or deleting. I know search is set to false for these files, but there's no reason to build and externalize them at all, as they are just old cruft.

Fine by me! I just wasn't sure if you had any plans for the stuff in there that felt more fleshed out. I think I will keep the mermaid diagrams and put it into templates as a reference but otherwise I'm good with nixing the rest.

[nrichers]

LGTM! 🚀