Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 14, 2024. It is now read-only.

transport protocol specification #471

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 16, 2021
Merged

transport protocol specification #471

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 16, 2021

Conversation

rshiv
Copy link
Contributor

@rshiv rshiv commented Nov 8, 2021

Signed-off-by: rshiv reeshav96@gmail.com

Signed-off-by: rshiv <reeshav96@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@jm-clius jm-clius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good start. Have left some comments and a question re upgrading.

content/docs/rfcs/31/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/31/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/31/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Hanno Cornelius <68783915+jm-clius@users.noreply.github.com>
content/docs/rfcs/31/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/31/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/31/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@staheri14 staheri14 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me! :) but I'd wait for Hanno and Oskar to approve.

content/docs/rfcs/10/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/10/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/10/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/10/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/10/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/10/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@jm-clius jm-clius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some comments on clarity. In general one idea per sentence may be easier to understand (e.g. having a single sentence explain that we can support both secure and unsecure websockets and the context in which they may be used may become ambiguous/difficult to parse).

content/docs/rfcs/10/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/docs/rfcs/10/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: rshiv <reeshav96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: rshiv <reeshav96@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: oskarth <ot@oskarthoren.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@jm-clius jm-clius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rshiv rshiv merged commit 0c884ac into master Nov 16, 2021
@rshiv rshiv deleted the protocol_spec branch November 16, 2021 15:00
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants